Publication: Low cost combination of DCIP and MCV was better than that of DCIP and OF in the screening for hemoglobin E
| dc.contributor.author | Prayongratana K. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Polprasert C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Raungrongmorakot K. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tatone K. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Santiwatanakul S. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-04-05T04:31:57Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-04-05T04:31:57Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
| dc.date.issuedBE | 2551 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Objective: To evaluate hemoglobin E screening tests in a large scale of cases. Material and Method: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted. Whole blood obtained from subjects was evaluated for CBC, OF, DCIP, and hemoglobin typing. Results: Five hundred twenty seven hemoglobin E and 280 reference subjects participated. DCIP's sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 97.16%, 98.93%, 99.42%, and 95.19%, respectively. These values of OF were 69.12%, 80.00%, 86.67%, and 57.88%, respectively. In the combination of DCIP and OF gave rise to these values of 99.43%, 79.29%, 90.03%, and 96.67%, respectively. Finally the combination of DCIP and MCV < 80 fL resulted in these values to be 99.43%, 98.93%, 99.43%, and 98.93%, respectively. False positive and false negative rate were 1.07% and 0.57%, respectively. Conclusion: Combination of DCIP and MCV was better than that of DCIP and OF in hemoglobin E screening. | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol 91, No.10 (2008), p.1499-1504 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1252208 | |
| dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-55249125926 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14740/3885 | |
| dc.rights.holder | Scopus | |
| dc.subject.other | 2,6 dichlorophenolindophenol | |
| dc.subject.other | Hemoglobin E | |
| dc.subject.other | Adult | |
| dc.subject.other | Article | |
| dc.subject.other | Descriptive research | |
| dc.subject.other | False negative result | |
| dc.subject.other | False positive result | |
| dc.subject.other | Female | |
| dc.subject.other | Human | |
| dc.subject.other | Major clinical study | |
| dc.subject.other | Male | |
| dc.subject.other | Mean corpuscular volume | |
| dc.subject.other | Osmotic fragility | |
| dc.subject.other | Screening | |
| dc.subject.other | Sensitivity and specificity | |
| dc.subject.other | 2,6-Dichloroindophenol | |
| dc.subject.other | Adult | |
| dc.subject.other | Cross-Sectional Studies | |
| dc.subject.other | Erythrocyte Indices | |
| dc.subject.other | Female | |
| dc.subject.other | Hemoglobin E | |
| dc.subject.other | Humans | |
| dc.subject.other | Male | |
| dc.subject.other | Mass Screening | |
| dc.subject.other | Osmotic Fragility | |
| dc.subject.other | Predictive Value of Tests | |
| dc.subject.other | Sensitivity and Specificity | |
| dc.subject.other | Thalassemia | |
| dc.title | Low cost combination of DCIP and MCV was better than that of DCIP and OF in the screening for hemoglobin E | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| swu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-55249125926&partnerID=40&md5=809907043b391a58fc7429c02729ed38 |
