Publication: Low cost combination of DCIP and MCV was better than that of DCIP and OF in the screening for hemoglobin E
0
0
Issued Date
2008
Resource Type
File Type
application/pdf
ISSN
1252208
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-55249125926
Rights Holder(s)
Scopus
Bibliographic Citation
Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol 91, No.10 (2008), p.1499-1504
Suggested Citation
Prayongratana K., Polprasert C., Raungrongmorakot K., Tatone K., Santiwatanakul S. Low cost combination of DCIP and MCV was better than that of DCIP and OF in the screening for hemoglobin E. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol 91, No.10 (2008), p.1499-1504. Retrieved from: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14740/3885
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate hemoglobin E screening tests in a large scale of cases. Material and Method: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted. Whole blood obtained from subjects was evaluated for CBC, OF, DCIP, and hemoglobin typing. Results: Five hundred twenty seven hemoglobin E and 280 reference subjects participated. DCIP's sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 97.16%, 98.93%, 99.42%, and 95.19%, respectively. These values of OF were 69.12%, 80.00%, 86.67%, and 57.88%, respectively. In the combination of DCIP and OF gave rise to these values of 99.43%, 79.29%, 90.03%, and 96.67%, respectively. Finally the combination of DCIP and MCV < 80 fL resulted in these values to be 99.43%, 98.93%, 99.43%, and 98.93%, respectively. False positive and false negative rate were 1.07% and 0.57%, respectively. Conclusion: Combination of DCIP and MCV was better than that of DCIP and OF in hemoglobin E screening.
Subject(s)
2,6 dichlorophenolindophenol
Hemoglobin E
Adult
Article
Descriptive research
False negative result
False positive result
Female
Human
Major clinical study
Male
Mean corpuscular volume
Osmotic fragility
Screening
Sensitivity and specificity
2,6-Dichloroindophenol
Adult
Cross-Sectional Studies
Erythrocyte Indices
Female
Hemoglobin E
Humans
Male
Mass Screening
Osmotic Fragility
Predictive Value of Tests
Sensitivity and Specificity
Thalassemia
Hemoglobin E
Adult
Article
Descriptive research
False negative result
False positive result
Female
Human
Major clinical study
Male
Mean corpuscular volume
Osmotic fragility
Screening
Sensitivity and specificity
2,6-Dichloroindophenol
Adult
Cross-Sectional Studies
Erythrocyte Indices
Female
Hemoglobin E
Humans
Male
Mass Screening
Osmotic Fragility
Predictive Value of Tests
Sensitivity and Specificity
Thalassemia
