Publication:
Evaluation of dermal irritancy potential of Carboxymethyl-chitosan hydrogel and poly-(acrylic acid) chitin hydrogel.

dc.contributor.authorRattanatayarom W.
dc.contributor.authorWattanasirichaigoon S.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T04:32:15Z
dc.date.available2021-04-05T04:32:15Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.date.issuedBE2550
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: The wound dressing synthesized from carboxymethylchitosan hydrogel (CM) and chitin-(polyacrylic acid) hydrogel (PAA) were examined for their dermal irritation potential response using the Draize test. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Eighteen male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into three groups (6 rats/each). Rats in group 1 were designed as control, group 2 were treated with CM, and group 3 were treated with PAA. The test materials diameter 1 x 1 cm were topically applied on the skin in group 2 and 3. Two skin sites (1 x 1 cm in size) were located at the back. One site was intact and the other was abraded in such a way the stratum corneum had no bleeding. RESULT: After 24 and 72 hours of wrappings, the materials were removed and the test sites were evaluated in terms of erythema and edema using adopted Draize scoring system. At the end of the experiment, all rats were anesthesized with intravenous thiopental sodium. Blood samples from descending aorta were collected for liver and kidney function test and all organs were weighed. The results of this experiment showed 1) no irritation of both materials in this animal model; 2) no material-related induced liver and kidney dysfunction and 3) organ weights had no significant difference between the groups. CONCLUSION: Both CM and PAA should be considered safe to use in the purpose of wound dressing in further clinical trials.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet. Vol 90, No.4 (2007), p.724-729
dc.identifier.issn1252208
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-36049023191
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14740/4919
dc.rights.holderมหาวิทยาลัยศรีนครินทรวิโรฒ
dc.subject.otherAcrylic acid derivative
dc.subject.otherBiomaterial
dc.subject.otherCarboxymethyl chitosan
dc.subject.otherCarboxymethyl-chitosan
dc.subject.otherChitin
dc.subject.otherChitosan
dc.subject.otherDrug derivative
dc.subject.otherUnclassified drug
dc.subject.otherAnimal
dc.subject.otherArticle
dc.subject.otherBandage
dc.subject.otherChemically induced disorder
dc.subject.otherEdema
dc.subject.otherErythema
dc.subject.otherHydrogel
dc.subject.otherMale
dc.subject.otherMaterials testing
dc.subject.otherPhysiology
dc.subject.otherRat
dc.subject.otherSkin
dc.subject.otherSprague Dawley rat
dc.subject.otherWound healing
dc.subject.otherAcrylates
dc.subject.otherAnimals
dc.subject.otherBandages
dc.subject.otherBiocompatible Materials
dc.subject.otherChitin
dc.subject.otherChitosan
dc.subject.otherEdema
dc.subject.otherErythema
dc.subject.otherHydrogel
dc.subject.otherMale
dc.subject.otherMaterials Testing
dc.subject.otherRats
dc.subject.otherRats, Sprague-Dawley
dc.subject.otherSkin
dc.subject.otherWound Healing
dc.titleEvaluation of dermal irritancy potential of Carboxymethyl-chitosan hydrogel and poly-(acrylic acid) chitin hydrogel.
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
swu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-36049023191&partnerID=40&md5=ea4a50a2e69960e74f862462d0b624f1

Files