Publication:
Nonformalin Fixative Agents: A Comparative Study of Fixative Efficacy and Histomorphology

dc.contributor.authorLam-Ubol A.
dc.contributor.authorKitrueangphatchara K.
dc.contributor.authorPutthanuparp T.
dc.contributor.authorArayakhun R.
dc.contributor.authorKwanthong R.
dc.contributor.authorChoonhawarakorn K.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T03:05:06Z
dc.date.available2021-04-05T03:05:06Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.issuedBE2561
dc.description.abstractObjectives. Formalin is a gold standard fixative agent. However, formalin possesses health hazards and is not always available in rural areas. The objective of this study was to compare tissue fixative efficacy of nonformalin fixative agents with formalin. Methods. Oral tissues obtained during impacted tooth removal were collected. The tissue fragments were sectioned and fixed in 4 different fixatives; 30% jaggery, 70% ethanol, 2% mepivacaine with 1:100 000 epinephrine, or formalin for 24 and 72 hours. All specimens were then immersed in formalin for another 24 hours and processed according to standard protocol. Hematoxylin and eosin–stained sections were evaluated by a pathologist. The cellular structure, cellular outline, and quality of staining were graded from 1 to 3 and average fixative efficacy scores were compared using 1-way analysis of variance. Fixative artifacts were described. Results. Fixative efficacy scores of 70% ethanol and 30% jaggery at 24 and 72 hours were not statistically different from those of formalin. Conversely, 2% mepivacaine demonstrated significantly lower fixative efficacy scores than other agents. Although efficacy of each fixative was not statistically different between 24 and 72 hours, efficacy of 70% ethanol was markedly reduced at 72 hours when compared with others. Acantholysis of epithelial cells was the most notable artifact at 72 hours when fixed with nonformalin fixative agents. Conclusion. Both 70% ethanol and 30% jaggery provided acceptable fixative efficacy at 24 hours. However, only 30% jaggery maintained fixative efficacy at 72 hours. Nevertheless, negative effects on the epithelial cells were unavoidable and should be interpreted with caution. © The Author(s) 2018.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Surgical Pathology. Vol 26, No.8 (2018), p.701-706
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1066896918779450
dc.identifier.issn10668969
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85048089980
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14740/5761
dc.rights.holderมหาวิทยาลัยศรีนครินทรวิโรฒ
dc.subject.otherAlcohol
dc.subject.otherEosin
dc.subject.otherEpinephrine
dc.subject.otherFixative
dc.subject.otherFormaldehyde
dc.subject.otherHematoxylin
dc.subject.otherMepivacaine
dc.subject.otherAlcohol
dc.subject.otherFixative
dc.subject.otherFormaldehyde
dc.subject.otherMepivacaine
dc.subject.otherAcantholysis
dc.subject.otherArticle
dc.subject.otherBasement membrane
dc.subject.otherCell junction
dc.subject.otherCell structure
dc.subject.otherComparative study
dc.subject.otherControlled study
dc.subject.otherEpithelium cell
dc.subject.otherHistomorphology
dc.subject.otherHuman
dc.subject.otherHuman cell
dc.subject.otherHuman tissue
dc.subject.otherInflammatory cell
dc.subject.otherIntercellular space
dc.subject.otherMouth tissue
dc.subject.otherPathologist
dc.subject.otherPriority journal
dc.subject.otherTissue fixation
dc.subject.otherTooth disease
dc.subject.otherArtifact
dc.subject.otherChemistry
dc.subject.otherCytology
dc.subject.otherDrug effect
dc.subject.otherMouth mucosa
dc.subject.otherPathology
dc.subject.otherProcedures
dc.subject.otherStaining
dc.subject.otherTissue fixation
dc.subject.otherTooth disease
dc.subject.otherTooth extraction
dc.subject.otherArtifacts
dc.subject.otherEpithelial Cells
dc.subject.otherEthanol
dc.subject.otherFixatives
dc.subject.otherFormaldehyde
dc.subject.otherHumans
dc.subject.otherMepivacaine
dc.subject.otherMouth Mucosa
dc.subject.otherStaining and Labeling
dc.subject.otherTissue Fixation
dc.subject.otherTooth Extraction
dc.subject.otherTooth, Impacted
dc.titleNonformalin Fixative Agents: A Comparative Study of Fixative Efficacy and Histomorphology
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
swu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85048089980&doi=10.1177%2f1066896918779450&partnerID=40&md5=035448097d7f0ff073fd065c574cd25d

Files