Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/14967
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRattanatayarom W.
dc.contributor.authorWattanasirichaigoon S.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T04:32:15Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-05T04:32:15Z-
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.issn1252208
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-36049023191
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/14967-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-36049023191&partnerID=40&md5=ea4a50a2e69960e74f862462d0b624f1
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: The wound dressing synthesized from carboxymethylchitosan hydrogel (CM) and chitin-(polyacrylic acid) hydrogel (PAA) were examined for their dermal irritation potential response using the Draize test. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Eighteen male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into three groups (6 rats/each). Rats in group 1 were designed as control, group 2 were treated with CM, and group 3 were treated with PAA. The test materials diameter 1 x 1 cm were topically applied on the skin in group 2 and 3. Two skin sites (1 x 1 cm in size) were located at the back. One site was intact and the other was abraded in such a way the stratum corneum had no bleeding. RESULT: After 24 and 72 hours of wrappings, the materials were removed and the test sites were evaluated in terms of erythema and edema using adopted Draize scoring system. At the end of the experiment, all rats were anesthesized with intravenous thiopental sodium. Blood samples from descending aorta were collected for liver and kidney function test and all organs were weighed. The results of this experiment showed 1) no irritation of both materials in this animal model; 2) no material-related induced liver and kidney dysfunction and 3) organ weights had no significant difference between the groups. CONCLUSION: Both CM and PAA should be considered safe to use in the purpose of wound dressing in further clinical trials.
dc.subjectacrylic acid derivative
dc.subjectbiomaterial
dc.subjectcarboxymethyl chitosan
dc.subjectcarboxymethyl-chitosan
dc.subjectchitin
dc.subjectchitosan
dc.subjectdrug derivative
dc.subjectunclassified drug
dc.subjectanimal
dc.subjectarticle
dc.subjectbandage
dc.subjectchemically induced disorder
dc.subjectedema
dc.subjecterythema
dc.subjecthydrogel
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmaterials testing
dc.subjectphysiology
dc.subjectrat
dc.subjectskin
dc.subjectSprague Dawley rat
dc.subjectwound healing
dc.subjectAcrylates
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subjectBandages
dc.subjectBiocompatible Materials
dc.subjectChitin
dc.subjectChitosan
dc.subjectEdema
dc.subjectErythema
dc.subjectHydrogel
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMaterials Testing
dc.subjectRats
dc.subjectRats, Sprague-Dawley
dc.subjectSkin
dc.subjectWound Healing
dc.titleEvaluation of dermal irritancy potential of Carboxymethyl-chitosan hydrogel and poly-(acrylic acid) chitin hydrogel.
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitationJournal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet. Vol 90, No.4 (2007), p.724-729
Appears in Collections:Scopus 1983-2021

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.