Publication:
Comparison of the performance of existing nutritional screening tools against subjective global assessment in cirrhotic patients

dc.contributor.authorChonmaitree P.
dc.contributor.authorSudcharoen A.
dc.contributor.authorPoonyam P.
dc.contributor.authorRoongsangmanoon W.
dc.contributor.authorKhuancharee K.
dc.contributor.authorLaoarphasuwong N.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-10T13:17:04Z
dc.date.available2022-03-10T13:17:04Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.issuedBE2564
dc.description.abstractBackground: Malnutrition in cirrhosis has a significant negative impact on morbidity and mortality. There is no agreed gold standard of the screening tool. Study comparing the diagnostic properties of nutritional assessment tools in cirrhotic patients is limited. The Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) is one of the global assessment tools. It is used to assess nutritional status in different patient populations. Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic properties of different nutritional screening tools compared with SGA in cirrhotic patients. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the HRH Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Medical Center. All cirrhotic patients were enrolled. The nutritional status was evaluated by the SGA, the Royal Free Hospital Subjective Global Assessment (RFH-SGA), the Royal Free Hospital-Nutritional Prioritizing tool (RFH-NPT), the Liver Disease Undernutrition Screening Tool (LDUST), the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI-O), the Nutritional Risk Index (NRI), the Spanish Society of Parenteral, the Enteral Nutrition (SENPE), and the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated to evaluate RFH-SGA, RFH-NPT, LDUST, MUST, PNI-O, NRI, SENPE, and CONUT compared with SGA. Results: Ninety-four cirrhotic patients were included. The mean age was 60.82 (SD 10.11) years. Patients with cirrhosis Child Turcotte Pugh (CTP) A, B, and C were 62, 21, and 11, respectively. Twenty-five patients (28.7%) were malnourished according to SGA, five with CTP A cirrhosis, twelve with CTP B cirrhosis, and ten with CTP C cirrhosis. The present study also showed that NRI had the highest sensitivity (100%) and LDUST had the highest specificity (94%). Conclusion: NRI is an effective tool with high sensitivity for identifying malnutrition in early stage of cirrhosis. © JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF THAILAND.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol 104, No.8 (2021), p.1301-1308
dc.identifier.doi10.35755/jmedassocthai.2021.08.12854
dc.identifier.issn1252208
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85113327338
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14740/7992
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.holderมหาวิทยาลัยศรีนครินทรวิโรฒ
dc.subject.otherAlanine aminotransferase
dc.subject.otherAlbumin
dc.subject.otherAspartate aminotransferase
dc.subject.otherBilirubin
dc.subject.otherCholesterol
dc.subject.otherCreatinine
dc.subject.otherHemoglobin
dc.subject.otherAdult
dc.subject.otherArea under the curve
dc.subject.otherBody mass
dc.subject.otherBody weight loss
dc.subject.otherChild Pugh score
dc.subject.otherControlled study
dc.subject.otherControlling Nutritional Status
dc.subject.otherCross-sectional study
dc.subject.otherDiagnostic test accuracy study
dc.subject.otherDietary intake
dc.subject.otherFemale
dc.subject.otherHuman
dc.subject.otherLiver cirrhosis
dc.subject.otherLiver Disease Undernutrition Screening Tool
dc.subject.otherLymphocyte count
dc.subject.otherMajor clinical study
dc.subject.otherMale
dc.subject.otherMalnutrition
dc.subject.otherMalnutrition assessment
dc.subject.otherMalnutrition Universal Screening Tool
dc.subject.otherMiddle aged
dc.subject.otherModel For End Stage Liver Disease Score
dc.subject.otherMuscle mass
dc.subject.otherNutritional assessment
dc.subject.otherNutritional Risk Index
dc.subject.otherNutritional status
dc.subject.otherPredictive value
dc.subject.otherPrognostic nutritional index
dc.subject.otherQuestionnaire
dc.subject.otherReceiver operating characteristic
dc.subject.otherReview
dc.subject.otherRoyal Free Hospital Nutritional Prioritizing tool
dc.subject.otherRoyal Free Hospital Subjective Global Assessment
dc.subject.otherScoring system
dc.subject.otherSensitivity and specificity
dc.subject.otherSpanish Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
dc.subject.otherSubjective Global Assessment
dc.titleComparison of the performance of existing nutritional screening tools against subjective global assessment in cirrhotic patients
dc.typeReview
dspace.entity.typePublication
swu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85113327338&doi=10.35755%2fjmedassocthai.2021.08.12854&partnerID=40&md5=59472cda2ec3a78417b1ef2a106976f9

Files