Publication: Molecular phylogenetics and character evolution of morphologically diverse groups, Dendrobium section Dendrobium and allies
0
0
Issued Date
2014
Resource Type
File Type
application/pdf
ISSN
20412851
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-84986598359
Rights Holder(s)
Scopus
Bibliographic Citation
AoB PLANTS. Vol 6, (2014)
Suggested Citation
Takamiya T., Wongsawad P., Sathapattayanon A., Tajima N., Suzuki S., Kitamura S., Shioda N., Handa T., Kitanaka S., Iijima H., Yukawa T. Molecular phylogenetics and character evolution of morphologically diverse groups, Dendrobium section Dendrobium and allies. AoB PLANTS. Vol 6, (2014). doi:10.1093/aobpla/plu045 Retrieved from: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14740/6276
Abstract
It is always difficult to construct coherent classification systems for plant lineages having diverse morphological characters. The genus Dendrobium, one of the largest genera in the Orchidaceae, includes ~1100 species, and enormous morphological diversification has hindered the establishment of consistent classification systems covering all major groups of this genus. Given the particular importance of species in Dendrobium section Dendrobium and allied groups as floriculture and crude drug genetic resources, there is an urgent need to establish a stable classification system. To clarify phylogenetic relationships in Dendrobium section Dendrobium and allied groups, we analysed the macromolecular characters of the group. Phylogenetic analyses of 210 taxa of Dendrobium were conducted on DNA sequences of internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions of 18S-26S nuclear ribosomal DNA and the maturase-coding gene (matK) located in an intron of the plastid gene trnK using maximum parsimony and Bayesian methods. The parsimony and Bayesian analyses revealed 13 distinct clades in the group comprising section Dendrobium and its allied groups. Results also showed paraphyly or polyphyly of sections Amblyanthus, Aporum, Breviflores, Calcarifera, Crumenata, Dendrobium, Densiflora, Distichophyllae, Dolichocentrum, Holochrysa, Oxyglossum and Pedilonum. On the other hand, the monophyly of section Stachyobiumwaswell supported. Itwas found thatmany of the morphological characters that have been believed to reflect phylogenetic relationships are, in fact, the result of convergence. As such, many of the sections that have been recognized up to this point were found to not be monophyletic, so recircumscription of sections is required.