Publication:
Investigating Cryogenic and Heat Treatment Effects on Hardness and Wear of Uncoated Carbide Inserts: A Microstructure and AI Approach

dc.contributor.authorChanpariyavatevong A.
dc.contributor.authorSe C.
dc.contributor.authorTimtong A.
dc.contributor.authorBoongsood W.
dc.contributor.authorWiangkham A.
dc.contributor.correspondenceChanpariyavatevong A.
dc.contributor.otherSrinakharinwirot University
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-28T07:55:52Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-01
dc.date.issuedBE2567-01-01
dc.description.abstractCarbide cutting tools are widely employed in industrial applications involving the machining of challenging materials. Enhancing tool life and mechanical properties is a critical concern within this domain. Cryogenic treatment represents a promising approach to achieving these objectives. This study investigated the impact of cryogenic treatment on carbide cutting tools, employing various treatment parameters including soaking period, tempering temperature, and tempering time. The objective was to evaluate changes in microhardness and wear resistance before and after the treatment. To investigate the microstructural and phase changes induced by cryogenic treatment, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and x-ray diffraction (XRD) were employed. To identify the optimal cryogenic treatment parameters for carbide cutting tools, this study employed machine learning techniques such as linear regression model (LRM), support vector machine (SVM), and extreme gradient boost (XGBoost) to estimate hardness, and SHAP value analysis to assess the significance of various treatment factors. The results show that the cryogenic treatment of carbide cutting tools results in enhanced hardness, wear resistance and microstructural changes within the tungsten carbide. Additionally, a phase transformation within the cobalt binder was observed. The machine learning analysis demonstrated that XGBoost outperformed LRM and SVM in terms of predicting microhardness, as evidenced by the R2, RMSE and MAE metrics. Additionally, SHAP value analysis identified the soaking period as the primary factor influencing microhardness, followed by tempering temperature and tempering time.
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Materials Engineering and Performance (2024)
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11665-024-10586-4
dc.identifier.eissn15441024
dc.identifier.issn10599495
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85212837591
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14740/20531
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectEngineering
dc.subjectMaterials Science
dc.titleInvestigating Cryogenic and Heat Treatment Effects on Hardness and Wear of Uncoated Carbide Inserts: A Microstructure and AI Approach
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.titleJournal of Materials Engineering and Performance
oairecerif.author.affiliationSuranaree University of Technology
oairecerif.author.affiliationSrinakharinwirot University
swu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85212837591&origin=inward

Files