Publication: Outcome after proton beam therapy versus photon-based radiation therapy in childhood-onset craniopharyngioma patients—results of KRANIOPHARYNGEOM 2007
0
0
Issued Date
2023-01-01
Resource Type
eISSN
2234943X
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85176607251
Journal Title
Frontiers in Oncology
Volume
13
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Frontiers in Oncology Vol.13 (2023)
Suggested Citation
Friedrich C., Boekhoff S., Bischoff M., Beckhaus J., Sowithayasakul P., Calaminus G., Eveslage M., Valentini C., Bison B., Harrabi S.B., Krause M., Timmermann B., Müller H.L. Outcome after proton beam therapy versus photon-based radiation therapy in childhood-onset craniopharyngioma patients—results of KRANIOPHARYNGEOM 2007. Frontiers in Oncology Vol.13 (2023). doi:10.3389/fonc.2023.1180993 Retrieved from: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14740/20709
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Background: Proton beam therapy (PBT) is being increas16ingly used to treat residual craniopharyngioma (CP) after hypothalamus-sparing surgery. Compared to photon-based radiation therapy (XRT) with PBT, less irradiation in the penumbra reduces the scattered dose to critical organs neighboring but outside the area of treatment, minimizing the risk of sequelae. Patients and methods: Between 2007 and 2019, 99 of 290 (34%) childhood-onset CP patients recruited in KRANIOPHARYNGEOM 2007 received external radiation therapy (RT) (65% PBT, 35% XRT). Outcome was analyzed in terms of survival, endocrinological and anthropometric parameters (BMI and height SDS), quality of life (QoL using PEDQOL), and functional capacity (FMH) with special regard to irradiation technique. Results: PBT became predominant (used in 43% and 72% of all irradiated patients registered within the first and second halves of the recruitment period, between 2008 and 2013 and 2013 and 2018, respectively). Five-year event-free survival rates after PBT or XRT were comparable (92% ± 4% vs. 91% ± 4%, p = 0.42) and higher than for the whole cohort since diagnosis, including non-RT patients (37% ± 4%). Radiation doses to the hypothalamus and pituitary did not differ between PBT and XRT. Endocrine deficits due to disturbances of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis (HPA) were already common before irradiation. During the first 5 years after CP diagnosis/RT, no differences between PBT, XRT, and non-RT CP patients concerning functional capacity and anthropometric parameters have been obtained. Only for the PEDQOL domain “physical function”, parental-assessed QoL was lower 12 months after PBT versus XRT or non-RT patients. Conclusion: QoL, functional capacity, degree of obesity, and endocrinopathy varied over time from diagnosis, but by 5 years, there was no significant difference between PBT and XRT upfront or delayed, nor was there any compromise in historic survival rates, which remained high >90%. RT of any type is extremely effective at stabilizing disease after hypothalamic-sparing surgery. The purported specific benefits of PBT-reducing sequelae are not proven in this study where the organ of critical interest is itself diseased, increasing an urgent need to better address and treat the tumor-induced endocrine harm from diagnosis in dedicated pituitary services. Other hypothesized benefits of PBT versus XRT on vascular events and secondary cancers await longer comparison. Clinical trial registration number: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/, identifier NCT01272622.