Publication: The Association Between GFR Evaluated by Serum Cystatin C and Proteinuria During Pregnancy
0
0
Issued Date
2019
Resource Type
File Type
application/pdf
ISSN
24680249
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85066001106
Rights Holder(s)
มหาวิทยาลัยศรีนครินทรวิโรฒ
Bibliographic Citation
Kidney International Reports. Vol 4, No.6 (2019), p.854-863
Suggested Citation
Kreepala C., Srila-On A., Kitporntheranunt M., Anakkamatee W., Lawtongkum P., Wattanavaekin K. The Association Between GFR Evaluated by Serum Cystatin C and Proteinuria During Pregnancy. Kidney International Reports. Vol 4, No.6 (2019), p.854-863. doi:10.1016/j.ekir.2019.04.004 Retrieved from: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14740/5315
Abstract
Introduction: Physiological changes in pregnancy result in increased cardiac output and renal blood flow, with a consequential increase in proteinuria. Data from studies of the relationship between proteinuria caused by isolated proteinuria and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) are still limited. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of isolated proteinuria on the cystatin C–based GFR in the third trimester of pregnancy. Methods: Data were collected from pregnant women in their third trimester whose serum creatinine levels were normal. The GFR of each participant was measured using serum cystatin C levels, and proteinuria was measured using urine protein–creatinine ratios. The participants were divided into 3 groups according to their level of proteinuria: normal (<150 mg/d), physiological (150–300 mg/d), and gestational (>300 mg/d). Changes in GFR were recorded for each group. Results: The study included 89 participants, of whom 66.3% had levels of proteinuria that did not differ from that of the normal population (<150 mg/d). The incidence of physiological and gestational proteinuria was 21.4% and 12.4%, respectively. The results demonstrate that proteinuria >101.50 mg/d was significantly associated with declined estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (r = –0.34, P = 0.01). The analysis found that proteinuria >491.27 mg/d led to a risk of GFR <90 ml/min with an odds ratio of 12.69, P = 0.02 when adjusted for systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and body mass index. Conclusion: This study suggests that the term “physiological proteinuria” is a misnomer. When used in the traditional manner, creatinine level has inadequate sensitivity to estimate GFR in pregnant women. We found that there is a significant decline in GFR when urine protein > 101.5 mg/d, which could be an early biomarker for renal pathology rather than pregnancy physiology, suggesting that further workup and precaution is required. © 2019 International Society of Nephrology