Publication:
Can we rely on the size of the lymph node in determining nodal metastasis in ovarian carcinoma?

dc.contributor.authorTangjitgamol S.
dc.contributor.authorManusirivithaya S.
dc.contributor.authorSheanakul C.
dc.contributor.authorLeelahakorn S.
dc.contributor.authorSripramote M.
dc.contributor.authorThawaramara T.
dc.contributor.authorKaewpila N.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T04:32:53Z
dc.date.available2021-04-05T04:32:53Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.date.issuedBE2546
dc.description.abstractThis study endeavored to determine whether lymph node size is a reliable indicator in determining lymph node metastasis in common epithelial ovarian cancer. We reviewed pathologic sections of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes removed from 104 ovarian carcinoma patients who underwent either primary surgical staging or secondary surgery from January 1994 to July 2001. All sections of each individual node were measured in two dimensions. The different sizes of nodes were studied statistically to determine the optimal sensitivity and specificity in predicting cancer metastasis. A nodal size of 10 mm was a specific point of interest. Of 2069 total nodes obtained, 110 nodes (5.3%) had metastatic cancer. More than half (55.4%) of these positive nodes had a nodal long axis of 10 mm and less. The sensitivity and specificity of nodal size at 10 mm were 44.5% and 81.1%, respectively. We conclude that lymph node size is not a good indicator in determining epithelial ovarian cancer metastasis. Mere sampling of only the enlarged nodes does not reflect the true positive incidence of nodal metastasis. To avoid inaccurate staging and improper management, complete lymph node dissection is proposed as part of surgical staging for ovarian cancer.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Gynecological Cancer. Vol 13, No.3 (2003), p.297-302
dc.identifier.doi10.1046/j.1525-1438.2003.13192.x
dc.identifier.issn1048891X
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-0642284876
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14740/6579
dc.rights.holderมหาวิทยาลัยศรีนครินทรวิโรฒ
dc.subject.otherCancer size
dc.subject.otherFemale
dc.subject.otherHuman
dc.subject.otherHuman tissue
dc.subject.otherIncidence
dc.subject.otherLymph node
dc.subject.otherLymph node metastasis
dc.subject.otherLymphadenectomy
dc.subject.otherMajor clinical study
dc.subject.otherOvary carcinoma
dc.subject.otherPriority journal
dc.subject.otherReview
dc.subject.otherAdenocarcinoma
dc.subject.otherArticle
dc.subject.otherCancer staging
dc.subject.otherLymph node
dc.subject.otherLymph node metastasis
dc.subject.otherLymphadenectomy
dc.subject.otherMethodology
dc.subject.otherMorphometrics
dc.subject.otherOvary tumor
dc.subject.otherPathology
dc.subject.otherPrediction and forecasting
dc.subject.otherAdenocarcinoma
dc.subject.otherBody Weights and Measures
dc.subject.otherFemale
dc.subject.otherHumans
dc.subject.otherLymph Node Excision
dc.subject.otherLymph Nodes
dc.subject.otherLymphatic Metastasis
dc.subject.otherNeoplasm Staging
dc.subject.otherOvarian Neoplasms
dc.subject.otherPredictive Value of Tests
dc.titleCan we rely on the size of the lymph node in determining nodal metastasis in ovarian carcinoma?
dc.typeReview
dspace.entity.typePublication
swu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0642284876&doi=10.1046%2fj.1525-1438.2003.13192.x&partnerID=40&md5=cf2f12e926c5b76507a681df56a1131b

Files