Publication:
AC Conductivity and dielectric properties of lepidocrocite-type alkali titanate tunable by interlayer cation and intralayer metal

dc.contributor.authorCharoonsuk T.
dc.contributor.authorSriphan S.
dc.contributor.authorPulphol P.
dc.contributor.authorVittayakorn W.
dc.contributor.authorVittayakorn N.
dc.contributor.authorMaluangnont T.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T03:05:10Z
dc.date.available2021-04-05T03:05:10Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.date.issuedBE2563
dc.description.abstractThe lepidocrocite-type layered alkali titanate AxMyTi2-yO4 has diverse chemical compositions with variation in charge per formula unit x, the interlayer cation A+, and the intralayer metal M. Despite this multivariable nature, the composition dependence of physical properties is not well explored. We report herein the AC conductivity and the complementary dielectric properties of Cs0.7M0.35Ti1.65O4, K0.8M0.4Ti1.6O4 (M = Zn, Ni), and the mixed-interlayer ion Cs0.6K0.1Zn0.35Ti1.65O4. For Cs0.7Zn0.35Ti1.65O4, the total AC conductivity is ~7 × 10-8 to 2 × 10-6 S·cm-1 at 200-350 °C, associating with an activation energy Ea ∼865 meV. Meanwhile, the conductivity of K0.8Zn0.4Ti1.6O4 is higher by 1 order of magnitude at much lower temperature (25-150 °C) and a smaller Ea ∼250 meV. This difference originates from the compositional robustness of the cesium-containing samples, contrasting with the sintering-induced changes in the potassium analogues. For the latter, the loss of the interlayer K+ ion results in (i) generation of carriers due to charge compensation, (ii) reduction of sheet charge density and weakening of electrostatic attraction, and (iii) widening of the interlayer distance, all contributing to a lower Ea in K0.8M0.4Ti1.6O4. The angular frequency dependence of conductivity, dielectric permittivity (up to a colossal value of 109), and dielectric loss follows the universal power law. Our work demonstrates the potential of simple compositional variation for electrical properties tuning, prompting a more in-depth investigation covering a wider range of possible candidates of x, A+, and M in lepidocrocite titanate. ©
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationInorganic Chemistry. Vol 59, No.21 (2020), p.15813-15823
dc.identifier.doi10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c02264
dc.identifier.issn201669
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85094983748
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14740/5778
dc.rightsSrinakharinwirot University
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.subject.otherActivation energy
dc.subject.otherDielectric losses
dc.subject.otherPermittivity
dc.subject.otherPositive ions
dc.subject.otherSintering
dc.subject.otherZinc compounds
dc.subject.otherCharge compensation
dc.subject.otherChemical compositions
dc.subject.otherComposition dependence
dc.subject.otherCompositional variation
dc.subject.otherDielectric permittivities
dc.subject.otherElectrostatic attractions
dc.subject.otherInterlayer distance
dc.subject.otherSheet charge density
dc.subject.otherTitanium compounds
dc.titleAC Conductivity and dielectric properties of lepidocrocite-type alkali titanate tunable by interlayer cation and intralayer metal
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
swu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85094983748&doi=10.1021%2facs.inorgchem.0c02264&partnerID=40&md5=449e043695bc705ffcf576e6a55881c6

Files