Publication: The effect of the type of foam pad used in the modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction and Balance (mCTSIB) on the accuracy in identifying older adults with fall history
3
0
Issued Date
2020
Resource Type
File Type
application/pdf
ISSN
10137025
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85091949713
Rights
Srinakharinwirot University
Rights Holder(s)
Scopus
Bibliographic Citation
Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal. Vol 40, No.2 (2020), p.133-143
Suggested Citation
Boonsinsukh R., Khumnonchai B., Saengsirisuwan V., Chaikeeree N. The effect of the type of foam pad used in the modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction and Balance (mCTSIB) on the accuracy in identifying older adults with fall history. Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal. Vol 40, No.2 (2020), p.133-143. doi:10.1142/S1013702520500134 Retrieved from: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14740/5281
Abstract
Background: The type of foam pad used in the modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction and Balance (mCTSIB) influences the accuracy with which elderly fallers are identified. Two types of foam are commonly used in practice: Airex and Neurocom foam. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy with which elderly fallers can be identified when the Airex foam and Neurocom foam are used in the mCTSIB. Methods: One hundred eighty-four elderly participants with a mean age of 69 years were classified into faller and nonfaller groups based on their 12-month fall history. Balance stability was measured under four conditions of the mCTSIB for 120 s each: standing on a floor or a foam pad with their eyes open or eyes closed. The time needed to maintain stability was measured by a stopwatch, and postural sway characteristics were measured using an acceleration-based system. Comparisons between groups were performed by two-way mixed ANOVA. The accuracy of differentiating elderly fallers from nonfallers with different foam types was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. The time to maintain stability under four conditions of the mCTSIB (composite score) and under two conditions on the foam (foam score) were used for the ROC analysis. Results: The results showed that the nonfallers required more time to maintain stability and had a smaller sway area than the fallers (p<0.001). The foam led to a larger difference between groups, suggesting the use of foam in examining the risk of falls. The Airex and the Neurocom foam pads led to a large area under the curve (0.93 to 0.95) in identifying elderly fallers and nonfallers when the composite and foam scores were used. A cutoff score of 447/480 s for the composite score and 223/240 s for the foam score yielded a posttest accuracy of 88% to 89%, with a sensitivity of 0.80-0.92 and specificity of 0.88-0.95. Conclusion: In conclusion, Airex and Neurocom foam can be used interchangeably with guidance in the mCTSIB, as they led to the accurate identification of elderly fallers among older persons who could walk and live independently in the community. © 2020 Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association.