Publication:
Comparative analysis of biomass and coal based co-gasification processes with and without CO2 capture for HT-PEMFCs

dc.contributor.authorMongkolsiri P.
dc.contributor.authorJitkeaw S.
dc.contributor.authorPatcharavorachot Y.
dc.contributor.authorArpornwichanop A.
dc.contributor.authorAssabumrungrat S.
dc.contributor.authorAuthayanun S.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T03:03:53Z
dc.date.available2021-04-05T03:03:53Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.date.issuedBE2562
dc.description.abstractWith the seasonal availability and low energy density of biomass and the high environmental impact of coal, the co-gasification of biomass and coal is an alternative approach facilitating a trade-off between renewable and non-renewable resources. The aim of this study was to investigate hydrogen production from the co-gasification of biomass and coal integrated by means of the sorption-enhanced water gas shift reactor (G-SEWGS) for a high temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell (HT-PEMFC). The effects of the gasifier temperature, the steam to fuel ratio (S/F ratio), and the equivalence ratio (ER) on the hydrogen production performance and environmental impact of the G-SEWGS were theoretically analysed and compared with the conventional gasifier integrated with the water gas shift reactor (G-WGS) and the sorption-enhanced gasifier integrated with the water gas shift reactor (SEG-WGS). As compared to the conventional water gas shift reactor, the addition of a CaO sorbent in the modified water gas shift reactor not only reduces the amount of the CO2 emission but also leads to an increase in the hydrogen concentration and hydrogen content. The G-SEWGS provides better performance in terms of its fuel processor efficiency and CO2 emission than the G-WGS and the SEG-WGS. Also, the problem of sulphur compound in the hydrogen-rich gas can be reduced by using of the sorption-enhanced water gas shift reactor (SEWGS). The best system exergy efficiency, which was around 22% for the power generation, was determined from the HT-PEMFC integrated with the G-SEWGS. The main exergy destruction of around 70% of the total loss was caused by hydrogen production processes. © 2018 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Hydrogen Energy. (2019), p.2216-2229
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.07.176
dc.identifier.issn3603199
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85052095885
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14740/5488
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.subject.otherBiomass
dc.subject.otherCalcium oxide
dc.subject.otherCarbon dioxide
dc.subject.otherChemical shift
dc.subject.otherCoal
dc.subject.otherCoal deposits
dc.subject.otherCoal industry
dc.subject.otherEconomic and social effects
dc.subject.otherEnvironmental impact
dc.subject.otherExergy
dc.subject.otherGases
dc.subject.otherGasification
dc.subject.otherHydrogen production
dc.subject.otherProton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFC)
dc.subject.otherSorption
dc.subject.otherSulfur compounds
dc.subject.otherCo-gasification
dc.subject.otherCO2 capture
dc.subject.otherExergy Analysis
dc.subject.otherHigh temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells
dc.subject.otherHydrogen production performance
dc.subject.otherHydrogen production process
dc.subject.otherRenewable and non-renewable resources
dc.subject.otherSorption enhanced water gas shift
dc.subject.otherWater gas shift
dc.titleComparative analysis of biomass and coal based co-gasification processes with and without CO2 capture for HT-PEMFCs
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
swu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85052095885&doi=10.1016%2fj.ijhydene.2018.07.176&partnerID=40&md5=c77d0e16c8cb472606d21ec01a3a9c76

Files