Publication:
Basis Pursuit and Linear Programming Equivalence: A Performance Comparison in Sparse Signal Recovery

dc.contributor.authorTausiesakul B.
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-14T03:17:44Z
dc.date.available2022-12-14T03:17:44Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.issuedBE2565
dc.description.abstractBasis pursuit (BP) with $\ell_{1}$-norm criterion received much attention in the past. One of its obvious applications is the discrete-time sparse signal acquisition. In this work, two alternative forms of the BP optimization are presented. Both are intended to perform the same task as the BP but are expressed as linear programming (LP) frameworks. The performance of the LP expressions, which are equivalent to the BP, is observed and then compared to that given by the typical BP. It is found that the error performance of the equivalent BP methods in terms of LP is the same as that of the BP algorithm. One of the BP-equivalent LP problems takes the same computational time as the BP, while another lasts longer in computation. In the same manner, the first BP-equivalent LP problem consumes nearly the same amount of required memory as the BP, whereas another occupies significantly more memory space during the computation. © 2022 University of Split, FESB.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationBMC Pediatrics. Vol 22, No.1 (2022)
dc.identifier.doi10.23919/SpliTech55088.2022.9854240
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14740/10342
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.subject.otherBasis pursuit
dc.subject.otherCompressive sensing
dc.subject.otherLinear programming
dc.titleBasis Pursuit and Linear Programming Equivalence: A Performance Comparison in Sparse Signal Recovery
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
swu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85138217533&doi=10.23919%2fSpliTech55088.2022.9854240&partnerID=40&md5=89552b8d6b6c5344c0ca35f4befc19f2

Files