Publication: Evaluation of malignancy risk in patients with SSc by autoantibody profile: a systematic review with meta-analysis
3
0
Issued Date
2025-01-01
Resource Type
eISSN
25141775
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-105020303165
Journal Title
Rheumatology Advances in Practice
Volume
9
Issue
4
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Rheumatology Advances in Practice Vol.9 No.4 (2025)
Suggested Citation
Towachiraporn K., Sanyanusin W., Rojhirunsakool S., Smith G.P., Lertphanichkul C. Evaluation of malignancy risk in patients with SSc by autoantibody profile: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Rheumatology Advances in Practice Vol.9 No.4 (2025). doi:10.1093/rap/rkaf115 Retrieved from: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14740/50723
Author's Affiliation
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Objective Increased risk of cancer has been reported in SSc patients; however, the magnitude of this risk seems to vary with SSc-specific autoantibody profile. We aimed to review cancer risk in SSc patients by autoantibody subtypes. Methods We systematically reviewed literature related to cancer in SSc patients from January 1980 to December 2023 using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. We performed a meta-analysis comparing cancer risk in SSc patients with ACA, anti-RNAP III antibody, and anti-Scl70 antibody. The search was conducted on 1 December 2023 and updated on 30 December 2023. Eligible studies were required to (1) include participants ≥18years who fulfilled the 2013 ACR/EULAR, 1980 ACR modified, or LeRoy and Medsger classification criteria, (2) report cancer incidence with SSc-specific autoantibody, and (3) analyse the relationship between SSc-specific autoantibodies and cancer. Results Twenty-two eligible studies were included and underwent meta-analysis. Anti-RNAP III positivity was associated with a significantly increased cancer risk in SSc patients (pooled relative risk (RR) 1.48; 95% CI 1.16–1.80), compared with anti-RNAP III-negative patients. While the presence of ACA was associated with a lower cancer risk (pooled RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.60–0.96) and may serve as an indicator for solely SSc, specifically limited systemic scleroderma. Conclusion Our meta-analysis showed that anti-RNAP III-positive SSc patients had a 48% higher risk of developing cancer compared with anti-RNAP III-negative SSc patients. Therefore, physicians should be aware of this elevated risk. Rigorous screening for malignancy by age-appropriate and relevant family history is recommended.