Publication:
Sustainable Reinforcement Methods for Brick Masonry Walls: An Experimental and Finite Element Analysis Approach

dc.contributor.authorMehmood T.
dc.contributor.authorAbid M.A.
dc.contributor.authorChatveera B.
dc.contributor.authorSua-Iam G.
dc.contributor.authorSaingam P.
dc.contributor.authorEjaz A.
dc.contributor.authorHussain Q.
dc.contributor.authorJoyklad P.
dc.contributor.authorSuparp S.
dc.contributor.correspondenceMehmood T.
dc.contributor.otherSrinakharinwirot University
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-18T19:00:02Z
dc.date.issued2025-07-01
dc.date.issuedBE2568-07-01
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates the enhancement of axial and shear strength in brick masonry walls reinforced with steel and fiberglass meshes. The novelty of this study lies in its thorough evaluation of various reinforcement types and their influence on both axial and shear strength, offering valuable insights to enhance the performance of brick masonry structures. By using steel and fiberglass meshes for reinforcement, the study promotes the use of durable materials that can extend the lifespan of brick masonry structures, reducing the need for frequent repairs and replacements. The findings reveal that double-layer steel mesh delivers the highest strength, effectively reducing brittleness and improving deformation capacity in both single- and double-brick walls. Specifically, single-brick walls exhibited increases in compressive strength of 38.8% with single-layer steel mesh, 31.2% with fiberglass mesh, and 19.7% with plaster. In contrast, double-brick walls showed enhancements of 73.6% with double-layer steel mesh and 43.5% with fiberglass mesh. For shear strength, single-brick walls improved by 115.1% with single-layer steel mesh, 91.3% with fiberglass mesh, and 42.1% with plaster, while double-brick walls experienced increases of 162.7% with double-layer steel mesh and 132.5% with fiberglass mesh. Additionally, Abaqus modeling under axial and diagonal compression closely matched experimental results, revealing less than a 10% discrepancy across all reinforcement types.
dc.identifier.citationBuildings Vol.15 No.13 (2025)
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/buildings15132180
dc.identifier.eissn20755309
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105010343599
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14740/21189
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectEngineering
dc.titleSustainable Reinforcement Methods for Brick Masonry Walls: An Experimental and Finite Element Analysis Approach
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.issue13
oaire.citation.titleBuildings
oaire.citation.volume15
oairecerif.author.affiliationNational University of Sciences and Technology
oairecerif.author.affiliationSultan Qaboos University
oairecerif.author.affiliationCOMSATS University Islamabad
oairecerif.author.affiliationThammasat University
oairecerif.author.affiliationKing Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang
oairecerif.author.affiliationSrinakharinwirot University
oairecerif.author.affiliationRajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon
oairecerif.author.affiliationKasem Bunding University
swu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105010343599&origin=inward

Files