Publication:
Odontogenic keratocyst and ameloblastoma: radiographic evaluation

dc.contributor.authorKitisubkanchana J.
dc.contributor.authorReduwan N.H.
dc.contributor.authorPoomsawat S.
dc.contributor.authorPornprasertsuk-Damrongsri S.
dc.contributor.authorWongchuensoontorn C.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T03:02:04Z
dc.date.available2021-04-05T03:02:04Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.issuedBE2564
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To describe the radiographic features of odontogenic keratocysts (OKCs) and ameloblastomas and to compare the radiographic findings between these 2 lesions. Methods: Radiographs of OKCs and ameloblastomas were retrospectively reviewed. Location, border, shape, association with impacted tooth, tooth displacement, root resorption, and bone expansion were evaluated. Chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests were used for statistical analysis. A p value < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Results: One hundred OKCs and 101 ameloblastomas were reviewed. The ratios of maxilla to mandible were 1:1.4 and 1:9.1 in OKCs and ameloblastomas, respectively. All evaluated features significantly differed between OKCs and ameloblastomas (p ≤ 0.001). Most OKCs showed smooth border (60%) and unilocular shape (82%), while most ameloblastomas showed scalloped border (77.2%) and multilocular shape (68.3%). Association with impacted tooth was found in 47% of OKCs and 18.8% of ameloblastomas. Adjacent tooth displacement was found in 33.7% of OKCs and 55.8% of ameloblastomas. Root resorption was more common in ameloblastomas (66.7%) than in OKCs (7%). Bone expansion was also more common in ameloblastomas (96.3%) than in OKCs (63.6%). Conclusion: A unilocular radiolucent lesion with smooth border, no adjacent tooth displacement, no root resorption and causing mild or no bone expansion is suggestive of an OKC rather than an ameloblastoma. © 2020, Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationOral Radiology. Vol 37, No.1 (2021), p.55-65
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11282-020-00425-2
dc.identifier.issn9116028
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85078973623
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14740/4934
dc.rightsSrinakharinwirot University
dc.rights.holderมหาวิทยาลัยศรีนครินทรวิโรฒ
dc.subject.otherAdolescent
dc.subject.otherAdult
dc.subject.otherAged
dc.subject.otherAmeloblastoma
dc.subject.otherArticle
dc.subject.otherChild
dc.subject.otherClinical evaluation
dc.subject.otherCone beam computed tomography
dc.subject.otherControlled study
dc.subject.otherData analysis software
dc.subject.otherDifferential diagnosis
dc.subject.otherDisease association
dc.subject.otherFemale
dc.subject.otherHistopathology
dc.subject.otherHuman
dc.subject.otherHuman tissue
dc.subject.otherMajor clinical study
dc.subject.otherMale
dc.subject.otherMandible
dc.subject.otherMaxilla
dc.subject.otherOdontogenic keratocyst
dc.subject.otherOsteolysis
dc.subject.otherPanoramic radiography
dc.subject.otherRetrospective study
dc.subject.otherTooth disease
dc.titleOdontogenic keratocyst and ameloblastoma: radiographic evaluation
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
swu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85078973623&doi=10.1007%2fs11282-020-00425-2&partnerID=40&md5=a171096b64e883efb54eca91fc002fdc

Files