Publication: A cultural exposition model for interpreting architectural heritage: A study on Pingyao historical city
6
0
Issued Date
2024-01-01
Resource Type
eISSN
27175626
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85210452072
Journal Title
Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism
Volume
6
Issue
4
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism Vol.6 No.4 (2024)
Suggested Citation
Liu M., Thimwatbunthong S., Ungkawanichakul P. A cultural exposition model for interpreting architectural heritage: A study on Pingyao historical city. Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism Vol.6 No.4 (2024). doi:10.36922/jcau.4189 Retrieved from: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14740/20541
Author(s)
Author's Affiliation
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Architectural heritage, encompassing both its material and immaterial aspects, serves as a vital lens for understanding the historical, social, and esthetic values embedded in a society. As a reflection of cultural evolution, it offers insight into the architectural technologies, social structures, and collective memories of specific historical periods. This article investigates the architectural history of Pingyao historical city by employing theoretical perspectives that integrate material, social, and spiritual dimensions. The study demonstrates how the philosophy and cultural values of ancient Chinese society are reflected in the spatial and architectural forms of Pingyao. The material dimension considers how principles such as Feng Shui, numerology, and color symbolism shaped the city’s general layout and building designs. The social attribute addresses the influence of Confucianism on spatial organization, the use of culturally significant architectural elements, and the function of key structures in fostering social unity among the population. The spiritual aspect explores concepts of Eastern origin, such as Yin and Yang, the Five Elements theory, and the “Unity of Heaven and Humanity,” as these are incorporated into the city’s external architecture. Furthermore, it examines the influence of Buddhism and Daoism on Pyingyao’s architectural features. This comprehensive analysis reveals that Pingyao is far more than a collection of historic buildings; it is an intricate cultural artifact, offering a unique perspective on earlier stages of Chinese thought and society. Therefore, the preservation and study of Pingyao’s architecture offer a valuable opportunity to deepen our understanding of China’s architectural history.