Publication: Political regime dynamics and social security reform: A case study of the social security act amendments during the periods of Yingluck and Prayuth
2
0
Issued Date
2016
Resource Type
File Type
application/pdf
ISSN
19112017
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-84989182836
Rights Holder(s)
มหาวิทยาลัยศรีนครินทรวิโรฒ
Bibliographic Citation
Asian Social Science. Vol 12, No.10 (2016), p.244-256
Suggested Citation
Satidporn W. Political regime dynamics and social security reform: A case study of the social security act amendments during the periods of Yingluck and Prayuth. Asian Social Science. Vol 12, No.10 (2016), p.244-256. doi:10.5539/ass.v12n10p244 Retrieved from: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14740/5153
Author(s)
Abstract
According to previous studies on social security policy in Thailand, a causal link between elected governments and developments in social security has been observed in the direction that the initiation and implementation of social security policy (and perhaps all other social welfare policies) occurred more frequently and more successfully when this country was ruled by an elected government. However, this observation appears problematic when brought to bear on the most recent cases of social security reforms that have occurred, especially during the period under Yingluck Shinawatra government when the attempt to amend the 1990 Social Security Act proposed by the organized labor and 14,264 public petitioners was rejected by the directly-elected House of Representatives; and the period under Prayuth Chan-ocha government when the Social Security Act Amendments of 2015, which included many requests from organized labor mentioned in the rejected bill, was passed by the appointed National Legislative Assembly. Relying on a strategic-relational approach, this paper claims that the changes and continuities in the social security policy in each particular period did not occurred as simply a result of the different types of political regime but was part of a broader effort to deal with the tensions and conflicts between and within different sections of the bourgeoisie, political parties, state agencies, and working class over policy problems, solutions, and directions that have emerged as a result of Thailand’s capitalist transition during the past decade. © 2016, Canadian Center of Science and Education. All rights reserved.