Publication: The ClassA framework: HRV based assessment of SNS and PNS dynamics without LF-HF controversies
0
0
Issued Date
2019
Resource Type
File Type
application/pdf
ISSN
1664042X
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85068385768
Rights Holder(s)
Scopus
Bibliographic Citation
Frontiers in Physiology. Vol 10, No.APR (2019)
Suggested Citation
Adjei T., Von Rosenberg W., Nakamura T., Chanwimalueang T., Mandic D.P. The ClassA framework: HRV based assessment of SNS and PNS dynamics without LF-HF controversies. Frontiers in Physiology. Vol 10, No.APR (2019). doi:10.3389/fphys.2019.00505 Retrieved from: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14740/5716
Abstract
The powers of the low frequency (LF) and high frequency (HF) components of heart rate variability (HRV) have become the de facto standard metrics in the assessment of the stress response, and the related activities of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and the parasympathetic nervous system (PNS). However, the widely adopted physiological interpretations of the LF and HF components in SNS /PNS balance are now questioned, which puts under serious scrutiny stress assessments which employ the LF and HF components. To avoid these controversies, we here introduce the novel Classification Angle (ClassA) framework, which yields a family of metrics which quantify cardiac dynamics in three-dimensions. This is achieved using a finite-difference plot of HRV, which displays successive rates of change of HRV, and is demonstrated to provide sufficient degrees of freedom to determine cardiac deceleration and/or acceleration. The robustness and accuracy of the novel ClassA framework is verified using HRV signals from ten males, recorded during standardized stress tests, consisting of rest, mental arithmetic, meditation, exercise and further meditation. Comparative statistical testing demonstrates that unlike the existing LF-HF metrics, the ClassA metrics are capable of distinguishing both the physical and mental stress epochs from the epochs of no stress, with statistical significance (Bonferroni corrected p-value ≤ 0.025); HF was able to distinguish physical stress from no stress, but was not able to identify mental stress. The ClassA results also indicated that at moderate levels of stress, the extent of parasympathetic withdrawal was greater than the extent of sympathetic activation. Finally, the analyses and the experimental results provide conclusive evidence that the proposed nonlinear approach to quantify cardiac activity from HRV resolves three critical obstacles to current HRV stress assessments: (i) it is not based on controversial assumptions of balance between the LF and HF powers; (ii) its temporal resolution when estimating parasympathetic dominance is as little as 10 s of HRV data, while only 60 s to estimate sympathetic dominance; (iii) unlike LF and HF analyses, the ClassA framework does not require the prohibitive assumption of signal stationarity. The ClassA framework is unique in offering HRV based stress analysis in three-dimensions. © 2019 Frontiers Media S.A. All Rights Reserved.