Publication: Causal Model of Herb Use Behavior Among Working-age Adults in Thailand
0
0
Issued Date
2024-07-01
Resource Type
ISSN
19758375
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85200695733
Pubmed ID
38938046
Journal Title
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
Volume
57
Issue
4
Start Page
399
End Page
406
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health Vol.57 No.4 (2024) , 399-406
Suggested Citation
Prasittichok P., Duangchan P., Prapasiri S., Intarakamhang U. Causal Model of Herb Use Behavior Among Working-age Adults in Thailand. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health Vol.57 No.4 (2024) , 399-406. 406. doi:10.3961/jpmph.23.554 Retrieved from: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14740/20251
Author's Affiliation
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Objectives: This study developed a causal relationship model of herb use from observational data and analyzed the direct and indirect effects of herb use on health according to the model. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 400 participants aged 26-59 years, selected through multistage random sampling. The instruments used for data collection included demographic information, herb use, health literacy (HL), perceived social support, societal values, and attitudes toward herb use. The conceptual model, hypothesized based on prior evidence, was tested using confirmatory factor analysis through structural equation modeling. Path coefficients were estimated using the maximum likelihood method. Results: The final model utilized empirical data, which showed that perceived social support had the most significant impact on herb use. This was followed by HL, positive attitudes toward herbal remedies, and societal values, with coefficients of 0.31, 0.18, and 0.16, respectively. When analyzing variables that indirectly affected herb use, it was clear that positive attitudes, perceived social support, and societal values significantly influenced herb use through HL, with influence coefficients of 0.08, 0.16, and 0.04, respectively. Together, these variables accounted for 68% of the variance in herb use. Conclusions: The findings from this study can be utilized to develop and implement strategies that guide the use of herbal products, ultimately aiming to improve human health.