Publication:
In defense of negative temperature

dc.contributor.authorPoulter J.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T03:24:00Z
dc.date.available2021-04-05T03:24:00Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.date.issuedBE2559
dc.description.abstractThis pedagogical comment highlights three misconceptions concerning the usefulness of the concept of negative temperature, being derived from the usual, often termed Boltzmann, definition of entropy. First, both the Boltzmann and Gibbs entropies must obey the same thermodynamic consistency relation. Second, the Boltzmann entropy does obey the second law of thermodynamics. Third, there exists an integrating factor of the heat differential with both definitions of entropy. © 2016 American Physical Society.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationPhysical Review E. Vol 93, No.3 (2016)
dc.identifier.doi10.1103/PhysRevE.93.032149
dc.identifier.issn24700045
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84963681276
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14740/5507
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.subject.otherLasers
dc.subject.otherMasers
dc.subject.otherTemperature
dc.subject.otherThermodynamics
dc.subject.otherBoltzmann
dc.subject.otherBoltzmann entropy
dc.subject.otherGibbs entropy
dc.subject.otherIntegrating factor
dc.subject.otherNegative temperatures
dc.subject.otherSecond Law of Thermodynamics
dc.subject.otherThermodynamic consistency
dc.subject.otherEntropy
dc.titleIn defense of negative temperature
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
swu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84963681276&doi=10.1103%2fPhysRevE.93.032149&partnerID=40&md5=5dccbe416ce538cbcda5d62c0918f0bb

Files