Publication:
Structural Behavior of Large-Scale Hollow Section RC Beams and Strength Enhancement Using Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) Composites

dc.contributor.authorSirisonthi A.
dc.contributor.authorJulphunthong P.
dc.contributor.authorJoyklad P.
dc.contributor.authorSuparp S.
dc.contributor.authorAli N.
dc.contributor.authorJavid M.A.
dc.contributor.authorChaiyasarn K.
dc.contributor.authorHussain Q.
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-14T03:17:40Z
dc.date.available2022-12-14T03:17:40Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.issuedBE2565
dc.description.abstractAn experimental program was conducted to ascertain the efficiency of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) in enhancing the flexural response of hollow section reinforced concrete (RC) beams. Nine beams were tested under four-point bending in three groups. Beams were cate-gorized to reflect the presence or configuration of the CFRP sheet. Each group consisted of three beams: one with a solid section, one with a square 50 × 50 mm x mm opening, and 1 with 100 × 100 mm x mm opening. Beams in 1st group were tested in as-built conditions. Beams in the 2nd group were strengthened with a single CFRP sheet bonded to their bottom sides. Configuration of CFRP sheet was altered to U-shape applied to the tension side of 3rd group beams. The inclusion of openings, regardless of their size, did not result in degradation of ultimate load and correspond-ing deflections. However, cracking loads were found to decline as the opening size increased. Regardless of the opening size and CFRP configuration, ultimate loads of beams increased with the application of CFRP. However, this improvement was limited to the debonding and rupture of CFRP in group 2 and 3 beams, respectively. A comparison in the behavior of group 2 and 3 beams revealed that the application of the U-shape CFRP sheet yielded better flexural performance in comparison with the flat-CFRP sheet bonded to the bottom of beams. In the end, In order to further evaluate the economic and performance benefits of these beams, the cost-benefit analysis was also performed. The analysis showed that the feasibility of the hollow section RC beams is more than the solid section RC beams. © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationPolymers. Vol 14, No.1 (2022)
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/polym14010158
dc.identifier.issn20734360
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14740/10319
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.subject.otherCarbon fiber reinforced plastics
dc.subject.otherConcrete beams and girders
dc.subject.otherCost benefit analysis
dc.subject.otherReinforced concrete
dc.subject.otherCarbon fiber reinforced polymers sheets
dc.subject.otherCarbon fibre reinforced polymer
dc.subject.otherCost-benefits analysis
dc.subject.otherFiber-reinforced polymers
dc.subject.otherFibre reinforced polymers
dc.subject.otherHollow section
dc.subject.otherReinforced concrete beams
dc.titleStructural Behavior of Large-Scale Hollow Section RC Beams and Strength Enhancement Using Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) Composites
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
swu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85122090643&doi=10.3390%2fpolym14010158&partnerID=40&md5=6d5ddde06691d9468a8d146f3c36ca70

Files