Publication:
Assessment of factor structure of the Eating Attitude Test-26 (EAT-26) scale using data of young adults in the sociocultural context of Thailand

dc.contributor.authorWongprachum K.
dc.contributor.authorNamyota C.
dc.contributor.authorKhiewkhern S.
dc.contributor.authorBourneow C.
dc.contributor.authorLongjumnong T.
dc.contributor.authorOnpui S.
dc.contributor.authorPrombol S.
dc.contributor.authorJomoui W.
dc.contributor.authorNghiep L.K.
dc.contributor.correspondenceWongprachum K.
dc.contributor.otherSrinakharinwirot University
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-12T06:24:26Z
dc.date.issued2026-01-01
dc.date.issuedBE2569-01-01
dc.description.abstractThe Eating Attitude Test-26 (EAT-26) is a widely used screening tool to measure symptoms and behaviors related to eating disorders (EDs). Previous studies in various countries have empirically assessed the original factor structure of EAT-26 based on their respective sample data. Their sample data did not support the original factor structure of EAT-26. Sociocultural factors may cause ED behaviors to differ among diverse sociocultural groups. However, assessing the EAT-26 factor structure using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) has not been done in Thailand. Thus, this cross-sectional study aimed to examine the factor structure of EAT-26 among 210 young adults in Northeast Thailand using both exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and CFA. The results of our study revealed similar findings to those of previous studies. The first finding indicated that the factor structure of the EAT-26 was inconsistent with the sample data obtained using EFA. Similarly, the second CFA finding indicated that the (EAT-26) model did not fit the sample data. However, the sample data from those previous studies and our sample data differed from those included in the original EAT-26 study. In other words, the sample data come from those participants who did not share the same sociocultural backgrounds different than those included in the original EAT-26 study. It can be concluded that sociocultural factors appear to play a crucial role in the ED screening stage. Therefore, adapting the ED screening tools to suit groups with different sociocultural backgrounds (e.g., young Thai adults) may be essential. Finally, future research should focus on developing an ED scale bank that accommodates the growing screening tools sensitive to sociocultural factors.
dc.identifier.citationHeliyon Vol.12 No.1 (2026)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e44171
dc.identifier.eissn24058440
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105023481452
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14740/55269
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMultidisciplinary
dc.titleAssessment of factor structure of the Eating Attitude Test-26 (EAT-26) scale using data of young adults in the sociocultural context of Thailand
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.titleHeliyon
oaire.citation.volume12
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahasarakham University
oairecerif.author.affiliationFaculty of Medicine, Srinakharinwirot University
oairecerif.author.affiliationVinh Long Department of Health
swu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105023481452&origin=inward

Files