Publication: Soft tissue compensation evaluation in patients with facial asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography combined with 3D facial photographs
0
0
Issued Date
2024-03-30
Resource Type
ISSN
24058440
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85187313804
Journal Title
Heliyon
Volume
10
Issue
6
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Heliyon Vol.10 No.6 (2024)
Suggested Citation
Supmaneenukul Y., Khemla C., Parakonthun K. Soft tissue compensation evaluation in patients with facial asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography combined with 3D facial photographs. Heliyon Vol.10 No.6 (2024). doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27720 Retrieved from: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14740/20595
Author(s)
Author's Affiliation
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate bilateral soft tissue, hard and soft-tissue thickness at various anatomical levels in patients with facial asymmetries. Moreover, we attempted to find out correlation between soft-tissue compensation and severity of asymmetry by using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) combined with 3D facial photographs. Study design: Based on menton deviation (MD), twenty-four subjects were divided into: mild-asymmetry group (n=12) and moderate-to-severe-asymmetry group (n = 12). CBCT images were superimposed with 3D facial photographs. Distance from the midsagittal plane to the outermost point of soft-tissue and hard-tissue were measured and calculated soft-tissue thickness. Comparison of soft-tissue thickness between deviated and contralateral side at any anatomical levels were performed within group, and correlation between bilateral soft-tissue thickness subtractions (soft-tissue compensation) and MD values was evaluated. Results: Within group, Soft- and hard-tissue distances were greater in deviated side than contralateral side at any levels. In moderate-to-severe group, significant differences were found at gonion and body of mandible level, whereas soft-tissue thickness was only found to be higher on deviated side at the level of mandibular ramus. Soft tissue compensation was negatively correlated with MD value at level of mandibular ramus (R = −0.5, P < 0.05). Conclusions: Asymmetry was found to be larger in the lower third of the face and was notably remarkable in the moderate-to-severe group. Soft-tissue thickness was thicker on the deviated side of the mandibular ramus. Thus, the soft-tissue compensation seems to be minimized in patients with more severe asymmetry.