Publication:
Treatment efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions of non-floating and floating bed activated sludge system with acclimatized sludge treating landfill leachate

dc.contributor.authorBoonnorat J.
dc.contributor.authorHonda R.
dc.contributor.authorPanichnumsin P.
dc.contributor.authorBoonapatcharoen N.
dc.contributor.authorYenjam N.
dc.contributor.authorKrasaesueb C.
dc.contributor.authorWachirawat M.
dc.contributor.authorSeemuang-On S.
dc.contributor.authorJutakanoke R.
dc.contributor.authorTeeka J.
dc.contributor.authorAngthong S.
dc.contributor.authorPrachanurak P.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-10T13:16:42Z
dc.date.available2022-03-10T13:16:42Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.issuedBE2564
dc.description.abstractThis research investigates the treatment efficiency and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of non-floating and floating bed AS systems with acclimatized sludge treating landfill leachate. The GHGs under study included carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O). The non-floating and floating bed AS systems were operated in parallel with identical landfill leachate influent under different hydraulic retention time (HRT) conditions (24, 18, and 12 h). The experimental results showed that the treatment efficiency of organic compounds under 24 h HRT of both systems (90 – 98%) were insignificantly different, while the nutrient removal efficiency of both systems were between 54 and 98 %. The treatment efficiency of the floating bed AS system, despite shorter HRT, remained relatively unchanged due to an abundance of effective bacteria residing in the floating media. The CO2 emissions were insignificantly different between both AS systems under all HRT conditions (22 – 26.3 μmol/cm2.min). The CO2 emissions were positively correlated with organic loading but inversely correlated with HRT. The CH4 emissions were positively correlated with HRT (26.3 μmol/cm2.min under 24 h HRT of the floating bed AS system). The N2O emissions were positively correlated with nitrogen loading, and the N2O emissions from the floating bed AS system were lower due to an abundance of N2O-reducing bacteria. The floating media enhanced the biological treatment efficiency while maintaining the bacterial community in the system. However, the floating media promoted CH4 production under anoxic conditions. The originality of this research lies in the use of floating media in the biological treatment system to mitigate GHG emissions, unlike existing research which focused primarily on enhancement of the treatment efficiency. © 2021 Elsevier Ltd
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationBioresource Technology. Vol 330, No. (2021)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124952
dc.identifier.issn9608524
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85102651742
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14740/7780
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.holderมหาวิทยาลัยศรีนครินทรวิโรฒ
dc.subject.otherBacteria
dc.subject.otherBiochemical engineering
dc.subject.otherBiogas
dc.subject.otherCarbon dioxide
dc.subject.otherEfficiency
dc.subject.otherGas emissions
dc.subject.otherLeachate treatment
dc.subject.otherNitrogen oxides
dc.subject.otherFloating medias
dc.subject.otherFloating-bed
dc.subject.otherGreenhouses gas
dc.subject.otherHydraulic retention
dc.subject.otherLandfill leachates
dc.subject.otherMBBR
dc.subject.otherN$-2$/O
dc.subject.otherRetention time
dc.subject.otherSponge media
dc.subject.otherTreatment efficiency
dc.subject.otherGreenhouse gases
dc.subject.otherBacterial DNA
dc.subject.otherBiogas
dc.subject.otherCarbon dioxide
dc.subject.otherDissolved oxygen
dc.subject.otherMethane
dc.subject.otherNitrogen
dc.subject.otherNitrous oxide
dc.subject.otherOrganic compound
dc.subject.otherPhosphorus
dc.subject.otherCarbon dioxide
dc.subject.otherMethane
dc.subject.otherNitrous oxide
dc.subject.otherActivated sludge
dc.subject.otherBioreactor
dc.subject.otherCarbon dioxide
dc.subject.otherCarbon emission
dc.subject.otherGreenhouse gas
dc.subject.otherLandfill
dc.subject.otherLeachate
dc.subject.otherMethane
dc.subject.otherNitrous oxide
dc.subject.otherWater relations
dc.subject.otherActivated sludge
dc.subject.otherAnaerobic ammonium oxidation
dc.subject.otherArticle
dc.subject.otherCarbon footprint
dc.subject.otherCorrelation analysis
dc.subject.otherExhaust gas
dc.subject.otherFloating bed activated sludge system
dc.subject.otherHydraulic retention time
dc.subject.otherLandfill leachate
dc.subject.otherMethanogen
dc.subject.otherMicrobial community
dc.subject.otherMicrobial respiration
dc.subject.otherNitrobacter
dc.subject.otherNitrogen concentration
dc.subject.otherNitrospira
dc.subject.otherNon floating bed activated sludge system
dc.subject.otherNonhuman
dc.subject.otherNutrient
dc.subject.otherPriority journal
dc.subject.otherSludge treatment
dc.subject.otherWater quality
dc.subject.otherGreenhouse effect
dc.subject.otherGreenhouse gas
dc.subject.otherSewage
dc.subject.otherWater pollutant
dc.subject.otherBacteria (microorganisms)
dc.subject.otherPorifera
dc.subject.otherCarbon Dioxide
dc.subject.otherGreenhouse Effect
dc.subject.otherGreenhouse Gases
dc.subject.otherMethane
dc.subject.otherNitrous Oxide
dc.subject.otherSewage
dc.subject.otherWater Pollutants, Chemical
dc.titleTreatment efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions of non-floating and floating bed activated sludge system with acclimatized sludge treating landfill leachate
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
swu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85102651742&doi=10.1016%2fj.biortech.2021.124952&partnerID=40&md5=61277f39cb9b674f653bd52b4c2fc55f

Files