Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/27170
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWanichwecharungruang B.
dc.contributor.authorAmornpetchsathaporn A.
dc.contributor.authorWongwijitsook W.
dc.contributor.authorKongsomboon K.
dc.contributor.authorChantra S.
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-14T03:16:57Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-14T03:16:57Z-
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn19326203
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85126893209&doi=10.1371%2fjournal.pone.0265844&partnerID=40&md5=14bddeec8996c6c74c0eb2fcda8e2335
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/27170-
dc.description.abstractPurpose To investigate agreement between 2 swept source OCT biometers, IOL Master700 and Anterion, in various ocular biometry and intraocular lens (IOL) calculations of primary angleclosure disease (PACD). Setting Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. Design Prospective comparative study. Methods This study conducted in a tertiary eye care center involving biometric measurements obtained with 2 devices in phakic eye with diagnosis of PACD. Mean difference and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with confidence limits were assessed, and calculations of estimated residual refraction of the IOL were analysed using Barrett's formula. Results Sixty-nine eyes from 45 PACD patients were enrolled for the study. Excellent agreement of various parameters was revealed, with ICC (confidence limits) of K1 = 0.953 (0.861-0.979), K2 = 0.950 (0.778-0.98), ACD = 0.932 (0.529-0.978), WTW = 0.775 (0.477-0.888), and LT = 0.947 (0.905-0.97). Mean difference of axial length (AL) was -0.01 ± 0.02 mm with ICC of 1.000. IOL calculation was assessed with Barrett's formula, and Bland-Altman plot showed excellent agreement in the results of the 2 devices for the IOL power and estimated post-operative residual refraction (EPR). Conclusions Mean differences of biometric parameters, obtained with IOL Master700 and Anterion, were small, and ICC showed excellent concordance. No clinical relevance in calculation of IOL power was found, and the two devices appeared to be comparably effective in clinical practice. © 2022 Wanichwecharungruang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science
dc.titleEvaluation of ocular biometry in primary angle-closure disease with two swept source optical coherence tomography devices
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitationFood Bioscience. Vol 48, No. (2022)
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0265844
Appears in Collections:Scopus 2022

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.