Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/14458
Title: Effect of WF10 (Immunokine) on Diabetic Foot Ulcer Therapy: A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial
Authors: Yingsakmongkol N.
Maraprygsavan P.
Sukosit P.
Keywords: immunokine
placebo
tetrachlorodecaoxide
unclassified drug
adjuvant therapy
adult
article
clinical article
controlled study
diabetic foot
disease severity
double blind procedure
drug efficacy
drug safety
female
granulation tissue
human
male
multiple cycle treatment
randomized controlled trial
side effect
skin inflammation
skin necrosis
thrombophlebitis
treatment outcome
wound assessment
wound infection
Aged
Chlorine
Combined Modality Therapy
Debridement
Diabetic Foot
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Double-Blind Method
Drug Administration Schedule
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Granulation Tissue
Humans
Infusions, Intravenous
Male
Middle Aged
Oxides
Reference Values
Severity of Illness Index
Skin Care
Treatment Outcome
Wound Healing
Issue Date: 2011
Abstract: This randomized controlled trial was undertaken to evaluate the effect of WF10 (Immunokine) as an adjunct to the standard treatment of diabetic foot ulcer. A total of 40 participants were randomized into 2 groups of 20. One group underwent standard therapy combined with infusions of WF10, and 1 underwent standard therapy combined with placebo. The wound severity scores, which vary with the severity of infection and inflammation, necrotic and granulation tissues, and wound depth and area, were assessed weekly for 9 weeks. Before treatment, the wound severity scores were not significantly different statistically between the 2 groups (13.7 ± 2.8 and 12.9 ± 3.2). After 9 weeks, the WF10 group had a statistically significant decreased wound severity score compared with that of the placebo group (1.8 ± 1.9 versus 4.4 ± 5.3, respectively, p < .05). Subgroup analyses comparing the WF10 and placebo groups showed statistically significant decreases of infection and inflammation (0.0 ± 0.0 versus 0.8 ± 0.9, respectively, p < .01), necrotic tissue (0.0 ± 0.0 versus 0.8 ± 1.1, respectively, p < .01), and an increase of the amount of granulation tissue (0.1 ± 0.3 versus 0.8 ± 1.2, respectively, p < .05). The wound depth and wound area also decreased more in the WF10 group; however, these decreases were not statistically significant. No severe adverse events were observed throughout the observation period. We concluded that the addition of WF10 to standard wound care statistically significantly reduced the wound severity score, infection and inflammation, and necrotic tissue and enhanced the formation of granulation tissue. © 2011 American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.
URI: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/14458
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-80054957456&doi=10.1053%2fj.jfas.2011.05.006&partnerID=40&md5=40369c9bdddb6484e3f9a05505e60c82
ISSN: 10672516
Appears in Collections:Scopus 1983-2021

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.