Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/13742
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChaikeeree N.
dc.contributor.authorSaengsirisuwan V.
dc.contributor.authorChinsongkram B.
dc.contributor.authorBoonsinsukh R.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T03:26:10Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-05T03:26:10Z-
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn9666362
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84926150303
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/13742-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84926150303&doi=10.1016%2fj.gaitpost.2014.09.011&partnerID=40&md5=06a21e86c6e2ac8c3e3c5515720765db
dc.description.abstractClinical Test for Sensory Interaction and Balance (CTSIB) is a simplified method for investigating the organization of multiple sensory inputs in postural control. The accuracy of the test is based partly on the foam types. Several types of foam are available, but the validity of these foams on CTSIB and the interaction of age and foam types have not been addressed. In this study, postural sway of young (21.6±3.3 years) and older (53.2±4.9 years) participants were assessed while standing on four types of foam: NeuroCom®, sponge, Ethylene Vinyl Acetate (EVA), and memory foams. Postural sway during stance on solid floor and foams with eyes open and eyes closed were quantified by root-mean-square (RMS) of center of body mass acceleration in the mediolateral (ML) and anteroposterior (AP) directions using the acceleration-based OPAL system. Physical properties of foams including density, Young's modulus, and indentation force deflection (IFD) were determined. Results demonstrated that RMS-ML in older subjects was larger than younger subjects (p≤0.001), especially when standing on the NeuroCom® foam with eyes closed (p=0.001). There was an interaction of age and foam types as larger differences in RMS-ML were observed between young and older subjects on the NeuroCom® and EVA foams, but not the other foams. The sway characteristics were largest when standing on the NeuroCom® foam which demonstrated high density and high compliance. Our findings suggested the importance of foam selection in CTSIB on accurate postural sway analysis and balance assessment. © 2014 Elsevier B.V.
dc.subjectacceleration
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectbody equilibrium
dc.subjectdevices
dc.subjectequipment design
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmiddle aged
dc.subjectneurologic examination
dc.subjectsurface property
dc.subjectyoung adult
dc.subjectAcceleration
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectEquipment Design
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectNeurologic Examination
dc.subjectPostural Balance
dc.subjectSurface Properties
dc.subjectYoung Adult
dc.titleInteraction of age and foam types used in Clinical Test for Sensory Interaction and Balance (CTSIB)
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitationGait and Posture. Vol 41, No.1 (2015), p.313-315
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.09.011
Appears in Collections:Scopus 1983-2021

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.