Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/13125
Title: Clinical inertia causing new or progression of diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetes: A retrospective cohort study
Authors: Osataphan S.
Chalermchai T.
Ngaosuwan K.
Keywords: alpha glucosidase inhibitor
dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor
glitazone derivative
hemoglobin A1c
insulin
metformin
oral antidiabetic agent
sulfonylurea
antidiabetic agent
glycosylated hemoglobin
insulin
adult
aged
Article
cohort analysis
controlled study
diabetic retinopathy
disease course
female
follow up
general practitioner
glycemic control
human
incidence
major clinical study
male
non insulin dependent diabetes mellitus
retrospective study
risk factor
Thailand
blood
complication
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
diabetic retinopathy
metabolism
middle aged
statistical model
time factor
university hospital
very elderly
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Diabetic Retinopathy
Disease Progression
Female
Hemoglobin A, Glycosylated
Hospitals, University
Humans
Hypoglycemic Agents
Insulin
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Thailand
Time Factors
Issue Date: 2017
Abstract: Background: Clinical inertia is a failure to intensify treatment according to evidence-based guidelines, and can have both short- and long-term adverse effects for type 2 diabetes (T2D). The aim of the present study was to demonstrate the effects of clinical inertia on glycemic control and diabetes-related complications. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a university-based hospital in Thailand. Medical records were evaluated retrospectively from January 2010 to December 2014. Patients were classified into two groups: clinical inertia and non-inertia. Clinical inertia was defined as failure to initiate insulin within 3 months in patients with HbA1c ≥9 % who were already taking two oral antidiabetic agents. Results: From 1206 records, 98 patients with mean HbA1c of 10.3 % were identified and enrolled in the study. The median follow-up time of these patients was 29.5 months and 68.4 % were classified into the clinical inertia group. The mean (± SD) HbA1c decrement in the clinical inertia and non-inertia groups was 0.82 ± 1.50 % and 3.02 ± 1.80 %, respectively, at 6 months (P < 0.001) and 1.46 ± 1.85 % and 3.04 ± 1.76 %, respectively, at the end of study (P < 0.001). Clinical inertia was associated with a significantly shorter median time to progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR); log rank test, P = 0.02 and a higher incidence of DR progression (10 vs 2.2 cases per 1000 person-months; P = 0.003). The adjusted incidence rate ratio for DR progression in the clinical inertia group was 4.92 (95 % confidence interval 1.11–21.77; P = 0.036). Being treated by general practitioners was the strongest risk factor associated with clinical inertia. Conclusions: Clinical inertia can cause persistently poor glycemic control and speed up the progression of DR in T2D. © 2016 Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
URI: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/13125
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84979238875&doi=10.1111%2f1753-0407.12410&partnerID=40&md5=db99f627d8590b021ef2feca62926d0f
ISSN: 17530393
Appears in Collections:Scopus 1983-2021

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.