Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/13045
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSaibuatrong W.
dc.contributor.authorCheroennet N.
dc.contributor.authorSuwanmanee U.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T03:22:07Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-05T03:22:07Z-
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn9596526
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85019633035
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/13045-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85019633035&doi=10.1016%2fj.jclepro.2017.05.006&partnerID=40&md5=4067ad7f81fbb581f3e777cdd22fa842
dc.description.abstractThe development of bio-plastics significantly contributes to sustainable development in terms of the waste management aspects associated with lower environmental impact. To achieve the aim of this study the life cycle assessment (LCA) of garbage bags from cradle-to-grave is evaluated and compared. The materials to be studied in this paper are polyethylene (PE), biomass polyethylene from molasses (Bio-PE), and poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate)-starch blends (PBAT/starch). The functional unit defined for three types of garbage bags is 1 bag. The SimaPro LCA software 8.2.3 with the Eco-indicator 99 method for life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) is used to assess the environmental impacts. The normalized score from cradle-to-gate of almost all of the environmental impacts for the PE bag is lower than the scores for the Bio-PE and PBAT/starch bags, except for climate change and fossil fuels impacts, the Bio-PE and PBAT/starch bags have a small, normalized score for climate change impacts. The single score of PBAT/starch bags is 14.9% and 47.1% greater than the scores of PE and Bio-PE bags, respectively. The environmental impact performance from cradle-to-grave of the incineration of Bio-PE with energy recovery is better than the other options, in terms of fossil fuels. PBAT/starch bags also have the lowest normalized scores for climate change, and for respiratory inorganics impacts when the bags were composted. The single score values of the incineration of Bio-PE with energy recovery and PBAT/starch in composting are favourable for all of the options studied. The environmental impact reduction of bio-based bags could be achieved through low resource consumption techniques in the packaging and production stages, and through the ultimate utilization of Bio-PE as a waste-to-energy concept and PBAT/starch when converted to fertilizers for agricultural applications. © 2017
dc.subjectButenes
dc.subjectClimate change
dc.subjectEnvironmental management
dc.subjectFossil fuels
dc.subjectIncineration
dc.subjectLife cycle
dc.subjectPolyethylenes
dc.subjectStarch
dc.subjectSustainable development
dc.subjectWaste incineration
dc.subjectWaste management
dc.subjectClimate change impact
dc.subjectEco-Indicator 99
dc.subjectLife Cycle Assessment (LCA)
dc.subjectLife cycle impact assessment
dc.subjectNormalized scores
dc.subjectPolies (butylene adipate co terephthalate)
dc.subjectResource consumption
dc.subjectStarch blends
dc.subjectEnvironmental impact
dc.titleLife cycle assessment focusing on the waste management of conventional and bio-based garbage bags
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitationJournal of Cleaner Production. Vol 158, (2017), p.319-334
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.006
Appears in Collections:Scopus 1983-2021

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.