Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/12497
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTheppornpitak N.
dc.contributor.authorUdompataikul M.
dc.contributor.authorChalermchai T.
dc.contributor.authorOphaswongse S.
dc.contributor.authorLimtanyakul P.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T03:03:47Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-05T03:03:47Z-
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn14732130
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85052462913
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/12497-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85052462913&doi=10.1111%2fjocd.12767&partnerID=40&md5=3b38680adce18b5f67ee254fee6ddffc
dc.description.abstractBackground: Nitrogen plasma skin regeneration is a novel device that produces heat to the skin, resulting in the production of new collagen. Because of lower energy with safer skin damage and lesser adverse effects who have high Fitzpatrick's skin type especially Thais, this technique is very interesting for clinical application for skin esthetic treatment. However, this treatment has yet been empirically studied as the treatment for mild-to-moderate periorbital wrinkles. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate clinical efficacy of nitrogen plasma for the treatment of mild-to-moderate periorbital wrinkles. Methods: Eighteen volunteers were enrolled. Each volunteer was randomized to receive nitrogen plasma treatment on one side of periorbital wrinkles with three sessions at a three-week interval and compared with contralateral side without treatment. Photographic examination, skin wrinkle (SEw) score, melanin index, patients' satisfaction score, side effect, and pain score were reported. Results: At over fourteen weeks, all volunteers completed the study. Treatment with nitrogen plasma group had significantly better improvement for periorbital wrinkles score by Lemperle scale, skin wrinkle (SEw) score by Visioscan® VC 98, and the melanin index by Mexameter® than the control groups (P = 0.004, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively). This study also showed significantly greater satisfaction score to favor the nitrogen plasma treatment group than the control group (P < 0.001). The short-term adverse effects included erythema, scaling, temporary hyperpigmentation, pruritus, and dryness. Conclusion: Nitrogen plasma skin regeneration is effective and safe for the treatment of mild-to-moderate periorbital wrinkles and darkening. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subjectnitrogen
dc.subjectnitrogen
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectclinical effectiveness
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectdisease severity
dc.subjectdry skin
dc.subjecterythema
dc.subjectesthetics
dc.subjecteye photography
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectgeneral condition improvement
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjecthuman experiment
dc.subjecthyperpigmentation
dc.subjectLemperle scale
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmelanin index
dc.subjectmiddle aged
dc.subjectnormal human
dc.subjectpain assessment
dc.subjectpatient safety
dc.subjectpatient satisfaction
dc.subjectperiorbital wrinkle
dc.subjectplasma skin regeneration
dc.subjectpriority journal
dc.subjectprospective study
dc.subjectpruritus
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trial
dc.subjectscaling
dc.subjectsingle blind procedure
dc.subjectskin disease
dc.subjectskin disease assessment
dc.subjectskin wrinkle score
dc.subjecttreatment duration
dc.subjecttreatment planning
dc.subjectwrinkle
dc.subjectcutaneous parameters
dc.subjectdrug effect
dc.subjectesthetic surgery
dc.subjecteye
dc.subjectfunctions of the skin and its appendages
dc.subjectregeneration
dc.subjecttreatment outcome
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectCosmetic Techniques
dc.subjectEye
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectNitrogen
dc.subjectPatient Satisfaction
dc.subjectProspective Studies
dc.subjectRegeneration
dc.subjectSingle-Blind Method
dc.subjectSkin Aging
dc.subjectSkin Physiological Phenomena
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.titleNitrogen plasma skin regeneration for the treatment of mild-to-moderate periorbital wrinkles: A prospective, randomized, controlled evaluator-blinded trial
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitationJournal of Cosmetic Dermatology. Vol 18, No.1 (2019), p.163-168
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jocd.12767
Appears in Collections:Scopus 1983-2021

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.