Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/12200
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhang W.
dc.contributor.authorZhu C.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T03:02:11Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-05T03:02:11Z-
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn19418647
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85073147743
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/12200-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85073147743&doi=10.4018%2fIJMBL.2020010105&partnerID=40&md5=ea770f1f7bb36ed86c9237cc4942e25c
dc.description.abstractBlended learning has been studied for many years. However, it is necessary to assess whether blended learning is a good practice as opposed to face-to-face and online learning. Based on the Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education, a questionnaire was designed to compare blended learning in seven dimensions to traditional and online learning. A total of 653 students participated in the research. Independent T-test, paired T-test and ANCOVA were conducted using SPSS. The results showed that blended learning was reported to have a higher effectiveness than traditional learning for all seven principles and a higher effectiveness than online learning for most of the principles. Learning modes had a significant effect on student perceptions on most of the principles. Gender had significant effect on student perception of all seven principles, while year of study and knowledge domain did not show significant effects on most of the principles. Possible reasons for these findings are discussed. Copyright © 2020, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.
dc.subjectStudents
dc.subjectBlended learning
dc.subjectEffectiveness
dc.subjectESL Courses
dc.subjectGood practices
dc.subjectHigher education
dc.subjectOnline learning
dc.subjectTraditional learning
dc.subjectE-learning
dc.titleBlended learning as a good practice in ESL courses compared to F2F learning and online learning
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitationInternational Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning. Vol 12, No.1 (2020), p.64-81
dc.identifier.doi10.4018/IJMBL.2020010105
Appears in Collections:Scopus 1983-2021

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.