Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/12508
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMongkolsiri P.
dc.contributor.authorJitkeaw S.
dc.contributor.authorPatcharavorachot Y.
dc.contributor.authorArpornwichanop A.
dc.contributor.authorAssabumrungrat S.
dc.contributor.authorAuthayanun S.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T03:03:53Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-05T03:03:53Z-
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn3603199
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85052095885
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/12508-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85052095885&doi=10.1016%2fj.ijhydene.2018.07.176&partnerID=40&md5=c77d0e16c8cb472606d21ec01a3a9c76
dc.description.abstractWith the seasonal availability and low energy density of biomass and the high environmental impact of coal, the co-gasification of biomass and coal is an alternative approach facilitating a trade-off between renewable and non-renewable resources. The aim of this study was to investigate hydrogen production from the co-gasification of biomass and coal integrated by means of the sorption-enhanced water gas shift reactor (G-SEWGS) for a high temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell (HT-PEMFC). The effects of the gasifier temperature, the steam to fuel ratio (S/F ratio), and the equivalence ratio (ER) on the hydrogen production performance and environmental impact of the G-SEWGS were theoretically analysed and compared with the conventional gasifier integrated with the water gas shift reactor (G-WGS) and the sorption-enhanced gasifier integrated with the water gas shift reactor (SEG-WGS). As compared to the conventional water gas shift reactor, the addition of a CaO sorbent in the modified water gas shift reactor not only reduces the amount of the CO2 emission but also leads to an increase in the hydrogen concentration and hydrogen content. The G-SEWGS provides better performance in terms of its fuel processor efficiency and CO2 emission than the G-WGS and the SEG-WGS. Also, the problem of sulphur compound in the hydrogen-rich gas can be reduced by using of the sorption-enhanced water gas shift reactor (SEWGS). The best system exergy efficiency, which was around 22% for the power generation, was determined from the HT-PEMFC integrated with the G-SEWGS. The main exergy destruction of around 70% of the total loss was caused by hydrogen production processes. © 2018 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC
dc.subjectBiomass
dc.subjectCalcium oxide
dc.subjectCarbon dioxide
dc.subjectChemical shift
dc.subjectCoal
dc.subjectCoal deposits
dc.subjectCoal industry
dc.subjectEconomic and social effects
dc.subjectEnvironmental impact
dc.subjectExergy
dc.subjectGases
dc.subjectGasification
dc.subjectHydrogen production
dc.subjectProton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFC)
dc.subjectSorption
dc.subjectSulfur compounds
dc.subjectCo-gasification
dc.subjectCO2 capture
dc.subjectExergy Analysis
dc.subjectHigh temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells
dc.subjectHydrogen production performance
dc.subjectHydrogen production process
dc.subjectRenewable and non-renewable resources
dc.subjectSorption enhanced water gas shift
dc.subjectWater gas shift
dc.titleComparative analysis of biomass and coal based co-gasification processes with and without CO2 capture for HT-PEMFCs
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitationInternational Journal of Hydrogen Energy. (2019), p.2216-2229
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.07.176
Appears in Collections:Scopus 1983-2021

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.