dc.contributor.author |
Grant A. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Tan C.J. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Wattanasirichaigoon S. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Rungruanghiranya S. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Thongphiew A. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Thavorn K. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Chaiyakunapruk N. |
|
dc.contributor.other |
Srinakharinwirot University |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2023-11-15T02:08:16Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2023-11-15T02:08:16Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2023 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85159406984&doi=10.18332%2ftid%2f161024&partnerID=40&md5=2c0dacd19927814a7e6764c12304ea43 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/29313 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
INTRODUCTION The SMART Quit Clinic Program (FAHSAI Clinic) has been implemented in Thailand since 2010; however, it remains unclear whether the benefits gained from this program justify its costs. We assessed its cost-effectiveness compared to usual care in a population of Thai smokers with cardiovascular disease (CVD) from a societal perspective. METHODS We conducted a cost-utility analysis using a Markov model to simulate lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of Thai smokers aged ≥35 years receiving smoking cessation services offered from FAHSAI Clinic or usual care over a horizon of 50 years. The model used a 6-month continuous abstinence rate from a multicenter prospective study of 24 FAHSAI Clinics. A series of sensitivity analyses including probabilistic sensitivity analysis were conducted to assess robustness of study findings. Cost data are presented in US$ for 2020. RESULTS The FAHSAI Clinic was dominant as it was less costly ($9537.92 vs $10964.19) and more effective (6.06 vs 5.96 QALYs) compared with usual care over the 50-year time horizon. Changes in risks of stroke and coronary heart disease among males had the largest impact on the cost-effectiveness findings. The probability that FAHSAI Clinic was cost-effective was 99.8% at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $5120. CONCLUSIONS The FAHSAI Clinic smoking cessation program was clinically superior and cost-saving compared to usual care for Thai patients with CVD in all scenarios. A budget impact analysis is needed to estimate the financial impact of adopting this program within the Thai healthcare system. © 2023 Grant A. et al. |
|
dc.publisher |
European Publishing |
|
dc.subject |
cardiovascular disease |
|
dc.subject |
cost-effectiveness analysis |
|
dc.subject |
smoking cessation |
|
dc.subject |
Thailand |
|
dc.title |
Cost-effectiveness analysis of the SMART quit clinic program in smokers with cardiovascular disease in Thailand |
|
dc.type |
Article |
|
dc.rights.holder |
Scopus |
|
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitation |
Tobacco Induced Diseases. Vol 21, No.April (2023), p.1-9 |
|
dc.identifier.doi |
10.18332/tid/161024 |
|