DSpace Repository

Cost-effectiveness analysis of the SMART quit clinic program in smokers with cardiovascular disease in Thailand

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Grant A.
dc.contributor.author Tan C.J.
dc.contributor.author Wattanasirichaigoon S.
dc.contributor.author Rungruanghiranya S.
dc.contributor.author Thongphiew A.
dc.contributor.author Thavorn K.
dc.contributor.author Chaiyakunapruk N.
dc.contributor.other Srinakharinwirot University
dc.date.accessioned 2023-11-15T02:08:16Z
dc.date.available 2023-11-15T02:08:16Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.identifier.uri https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85159406984&doi=10.18332%2ftid%2f161024&partnerID=40&md5=2c0dacd19927814a7e6764c12304ea43
dc.identifier.uri https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/29313
dc.description.abstract INTRODUCTION The SMART Quit Clinic Program (FAHSAI Clinic) has been implemented in Thailand since 2010; however, it remains unclear whether the benefits gained from this program justify its costs. We assessed its cost-effectiveness compared to usual care in a population of Thai smokers with cardiovascular disease (CVD) from a societal perspective. METHODS We conducted a cost-utility analysis using a Markov model to simulate lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of Thai smokers aged ≥35 years receiving smoking cessation services offered from FAHSAI Clinic or usual care over a horizon of 50 years. The model used a 6-month continuous abstinence rate from a multicenter prospective study of 24 FAHSAI Clinics. A series of sensitivity analyses including probabilistic sensitivity analysis were conducted to assess robustness of study findings. Cost data are presented in US$ for 2020. RESULTS The FAHSAI Clinic was dominant as it was less costly ($9537.92 vs $10964.19) and more effective (6.06 vs 5.96 QALYs) compared with usual care over the 50-year time horizon. Changes in risks of stroke and coronary heart disease among males had the largest impact on the cost-effectiveness findings. The probability that FAHSAI Clinic was cost-effective was 99.8% at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $5120. CONCLUSIONS The FAHSAI Clinic smoking cessation program was clinically superior and cost-saving compared to usual care for Thai patients with CVD in all scenarios. A budget impact analysis is needed to estimate the financial impact of adopting this program within the Thai healthcare system. © 2023 Grant A. et al.
dc.publisher European Publishing
dc.subject cardiovascular disease
dc.subject cost-effectiveness analysis
dc.subject smoking cessation
dc.subject Thailand
dc.title Cost-effectiveness analysis of the SMART quit clinic program in smokers with cardiovascular disease in Thailand
dc.type Article
dc.rights.holder Scopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitation Tobacco Induced Diseases. Vol 21, No.April (2023), p.1-9
dc.identifier.doi 10.18332/tid/161024


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics