DSpace Repository

Adhesive Precoated Bracket: Is It Worth Using? Long-term Shear Bond Strength: An in Vitro Study

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Vorachart W.
dc.contributor.author Sombuntham N.
dc.contributor.author Parakonthun K.
dc.contributor.other Srinakharinwirot University
dc.date.accessioned 2023-11-15T01:54:30Z
dc.date.available 2023-11-15T01:54:30Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.identifier.uri https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85125562945&doi=10.1055%2fs-0041-1740224&partnerID=40&md5=eec4d861c2f74e8fe0d7ed0cacd275c7
dc.identifier.uri https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/29095
dc.description.abstract Objectives The objectives of this study were to compare the long-term shear bond strength of conventional adhesive on metal brackets with that of adhesive precoated brackets in vitro and to evaluate the amount of adhesive remnant on the tooth surface after debonding. Materials and Methods A total of 90 maxillary permanent premolars were randomly divided into two groups. The samples in the first group were bonded with metal brackets using Transbond PLUS Color Change Adhesive (TP), and the samples in the second group were bonded with Flash-Free adhesive precoated brackets (APC FF). The bonding techniques were performed, according to the manufacturer's instructions. The samples from each group were randomly divided into three subgroups with different thermal cycles (n = 15). The shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive remnant index (ARI) were measured and calculated. Statistical Analysis Two-way ANOVA and Chi-square test were used to analyze the differences in the SBS and ARI between the groups, respectively. Results The means of the SBS of the APC FF subgroups were significantly lower than those of the TP subgroups, except in the 10,000 thermocycle subgroups. Chi-square test showed no statistically significant differences between the groups and subgroups. An ARI score of 1 was the predominant score in both groups. Conclusions This study found that the SBS of APC FF gradually increased with time and thermal aging did not affect the failure pattern. © 2022 Georg Thieme Verlag. All rights reserved.
dc.publisher Georg Thieme Verlag
dc.subject adhesive precoated bracket
dc.subject APC flash-free
dc.subject orthodontic adhesive
dc.subject shear bond strength
dc.subject thermal cycling
dc.subject adhesive precoated bracket
dc.subject APC flash-free
dc.subject orthodontic adhesive
dc.subject shear bond strength
dc.subject thermal cycling
dc.title Adhesive Precoated Bracket: Is It Worth Using? Long-term Shear Bond Strength: An in Vitro Study
dc.type Article
dc.rights.holder Scopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitation European Journal of Dentistry. Vol 16, No.4 (2022), p.841-847
dc.identifier.doi 10.1055/s-0041-1740224


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics