DSpace Repository

A comparison of bacterial colonization between nasogastric and orogastric enteral feeding tubes in infants in the neonatal intensive care unit

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Vongbhavit K.
dc.contributor.author Salinero L.K.
dc.contributor.author Kalanetra K.M.
dc.contributor.author Masarweh C.
dc.contributor.author Yu A.
dc.contributor.author Taft D.H.
dc.contributor.author Mills D.A.
dc.contributor.author Underwood M.A.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-12-14T03:17:50Z
dc.date.available 2022-12-14T03:17:50Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.identifier.issn 7438346
dc.identifier.uri https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85134297604&doi=10.1038%2fs41372-022-01452-z&partnerID=40&md5=e7c3fe28b9305eb60da30a80425a460c
dc.identifier.uri https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/27629
dc.description.abstract Objective: Feeding tubes harbor microbial contaminants; studies to date have not explored differences between orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) tube biofilms. We sought to extend a previous analysis by comparing bacterial colonization by location (OG v NG) and by evaluating clinical factors that may affect tube bacterial populations. Study design: The pharyngeal segments of 41 infant feeding tubes (14 OG and 27 NG) from 41 infants were analyzed by next generation 16 S rRNA sequencing on the MiSeq platform. Results: At the phylum level, Proteobacteria had the highest relative abundance of both OG and NG tubes. At the genus/species level, nine taxa differed significantly between OG and NG tubes. Alpha and beta diversity analyses showed significant differences between OG and NG tubes with relatively little contribution from clinical factors. Conclusion: The route of feeding tube insertion (oral vs nasal) had a greater impact on bacterial colonization than the assessed clinical factors. © 2022, The Author(s).
dc.language en
dc.publisher Springer Nature
dc.title A comparison of bacterial colonization between nasogastric and orogastric enteral feeding tubes in infants in the neonatal intensive care unit
dc.type Article
dc.rights.holder Scopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitation Journal of Behavioral Science. Vol 17, No.3 (2022), p.51-64
dc.identifier.doi 10.1038/s41372-022-01452-z


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics