DSpace Repository

Clinical evaluation of ocular biometry of dual Scheimpflug analyzer, GALILEI G6 and swept source optical coherence tomography, ANTERION

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Wanichwecharungruang B.
dc.contributor.author Amornpetchsathaporn A.
dc.contributor.author Kongsomboon K.
dc.contributor.author Wongwijitsook W.
dc.contributor.author Annopawong K.
dc.contributor.author Chantra S.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-12-14T03:17:48Z
dc.date.available 2022-12-14T03:17:48Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.identifier.issn 20452322
dc.identifier.uri https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85125780091&doi=10.1038%2fs41598-022-07696-1&partnerID=40&md5=4ca07513ffbf2a1ca9561b2b4dc3fc01
dc.identifier.uri https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/27619
dc.description.abstract To evaluate the performance of a new swept source optical coherence tomography optical biometer, ANTERION, in ocular biometry and intraocular lens (IOL) calculation compared with the reference standard of Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer (GALILEI, G6). A prospective comparative study was conducted in a tertiary eye center. Cataract patients were scanned with both devices in a random fashion, and parameters from the devices were analyzed in terms of mean difference and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Bland–Altman plots were performed to compare agreement between the devices. Ninety-six eyes from 96 patients were enrolled for evaluation. With the exception of ACD, all parameters were significantly different, but excellent agreement was revealed for all of them. The mean difference in axial length was 0.03 mm, and ICC was 0.999. Calculated IOL power with Barrett formula revealed that 93.75% were within 1 diopter and the prediction error was 0.03 diopter. Biometry of the devices were arithmetically different. However, the mean difference of the key factors in IOL calculation were small and appeared to be negligible for the purposes of clinical application. The performance of ANTERION was comparable to that of G6 in biometric measurement and IOL calculation; however, the devices cannot be used interchangeably. © 2022, The Author(s).
dc.language en
dc.publisher Nature Research
dc.title Clinical evaluation of ocular biometry of dual Scheimpflug analyzer, GALILEI G6 and swept source optical coherence tomography, ANTERION
dc.type Article
dc.rights.holder Scopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitation Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science. Vol 12, No.9 (2022), p.11-16
dc.identifier.doi 10.1038/s41598-022-07696-1


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics