DSpace Repository

Immediate effect of voluntary-induced stepping response training on protective stepping in persons with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Chayasit P.
dc.contributor.author Hollands K.
dc.contributor.author Hollands M.
dc.contributor.author Boonsinsukh R.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-12-14T03:17:44Z
dc.date.available 2022-12-14T03:17:44Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.identifier.issn 9638288
dc.identifier.uri https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85086666502&doi=10.1080%2f09638288.2020.1769205&partnerID=40&md5=3f4250760631e541dd616d6c688ebf8e
dc.identifier.uri https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/27592
dc.description.abstract Purpose: To compare the immediate effects of voluntary-induced stepping response training (VSR) and DynSTABLE perturbation training (DST) on protective stepping in patients with stroke. Methods: A randomized controlled trial (registration number: TCTR20170827001) was conducted in 34 patients with chronic stroke who were randomly allocated to the VSR (n = 17) or DST (n = 17) group. The VSR group was instructed to lean forward to induce protective stepping, while the DST group experienced support surface translation. All participants received one session of training (3 set, 10 min for each set with 10-minute rest in between). Step length, step width, number of steps and center of mass (CoM) position during protective stepping were assessed using a computer-assisted rehabilitation environment (CAREN) system prior to and immediately after training. Two-way ANOVA was used to compare between groups and times. Results: Both types of training resulted in an increase in step width, but step length increased and there was a more positive COM position exhibited following DST (p <.05) than following VSR. Single-step incidence increased, whereas multiple-step incidence decreased significantly in both groups. Only participants in the VSR group generated protective stepping with the affected leg in a larger percentage of trials (27%) after training than before training. Conclusion: Both DST and VSR led to changes in protective stepping parameters after a single session of training. VSR may be a feasible alternative to equipment-based training but requires further study.Implication for Rehabilitation VSR and DST trainings improved protective stepping in stroke. Step length and CoM control at foot touchdown increased after DST training. VSR training for 50 minutes led to increase affected stepping and reduce grasping. Step width, affected step length, and single step increased after both trainings. Without instrument, VSR increased steps execution and performance similar to DST. © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
dc.language en
dc.title Immediate effect of voluntary-induced stepping response training on protective stepping in persons with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial
dc.type Article
dc.rights.holder Scopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitation Disability and Rehabilitation. Vol 44, No.3 (2022), p.420-427
dc.identifier.doi 10.1080/09638288.2020.1769205


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics