DSpace Repository

Characterization of biologically active compounds from different herbs: Influence of drying and extraction methods

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Cheenkachorn K.
dc.contributor.author Paulraj M.G.
dc.contributor.author Tantayotai P.
dc.contributor.author Phakeenuya V.
dc.contributor.author Sriariyanun M.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-12-14T03:17:41Z
dc.date.available 2022-12-14T03:17:41Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.identifier.issn 194522
dc.identifier.uri https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85120895955&doi=10.1016%2fj.jics.2021.100297&partnerID=40&md5=5cb432e6317ef3a63e2a3bdf238e26b8
dc.identifier.uri https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/27578
dc.description.abstract The hot air (HA) method is the most widely implemented drying method for plants (herbs, vegetables, and fruits). This method has a few drawbacks that include long drying time, limited heat transfer, and limited thermal conductivity. This study investigated the effects of HA and infra-red (IR) heating method on biologically active compounds from different herbs (Khaffir lime, Lemongrass, Prai, Tamarind, and Turmeric). The efficiency of the drying methods was evaluated by considering (a) moisture ratio (MR), (b) specific energy consumption (SEC, MJ/kg.H2O), (c) moisture diffusivity (Deff), and (d) activation energy (Ea, kJ/mol). The active compounds were extracted from HA and IR dried herbs using different solvents (hexane, water, and ethanol) through Solid-Liquid Extraction (SLE) and Soxhlet Solvent Extraction (SSE) methods. The moisture removal in the IR drying process increased 10–11% for the herb samples. Specific energy consumption (SEC) increase during the IR drying process is attributed to the rapid evaporation of water at shorter time intervals than HA. Activation energy (Ea) values decreased by 1.66, 1.48, 2.24, 3.13, and 2.07 fold times for IR dried prai, turmeric, lemongrass, tamarind, and kaffir lime, respectively. The higher yields of herbal extracts and the abundance of bioactive terpene derivatives in hexane extracts were obtained from HA herbs compared to IR samples. Therefore, it is concluded that the IR method and SSE process using hexane was suitable to dry and retain the bioactive active compounds within herbs. Further, the IR method over the HA method was considered based on energy consumption, processing time, yield, and active compounds. © 2021 Indian Chemical Society
dc.language en
dc.subject alcohol
dc.subject alpha cubebene
dc.subject alpha farnesene
dc.subject alpha muurolene
dc.subject alpha terpinyl acetate
dc.subject beta bisabolene
dc.subject beta famesene
dc.subject borneol
dc.subject carveol
dc.subject caryophyllene
dc.subject cis sesquisabinene hydrate
dc.title Characterization of biologically active compounds from different herbs: Influence of drying and extraction methods
dc.type Article
dc.rights.holder Scopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitation Journal of the Indian Chemical Society. Vol 99, No.1 (2022)
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.jics.2021.100297


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics