DSpace Repository

Prediction of geopolymer concrete compressive strength using novel machine learning algorithms

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ahmad A.
dc.contributor.author Ahmad W.
dc.contributor.author Chaiyasarn K.
dc.contributor.author Ostrowski K.A.
dc.contributor.author Aslam F.
dc.contributor.author Zajdel P.
dc.contributor.author Joyklad P.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-03-10T13:17:41Z
dc.date.available 2022-03-10T13:17:41Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.issn 20734360
dc.identifier.other 2-s2.0-85116312721
dc.identifier.uri https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/17584
dc.identifier.uri https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85116312721&doi=10.3390%2fpolym13193389&partnerID=40&md5=85b8d04195a27ee1120672e0aca36bea
dc.description.abstract The innovation of geopolymer concrete (GPC) plays a vital role not only in reducing the environmental threat but also as an exceptional material for sustainable development. The application of supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms to forecast the mechanical properties of concrete also has a significant role in developing the innovative environment in the field of civil engineering. This study was based on the use of the artificial neural network (ANN), boosting, and AdaBoost ML approaches, based on the python coding to predict the compressive strength (CS) of high calcium fly-ash-based GPC. The performance comparison of both the employed techniques in terms of prediction reveals that the ensemble ML approaches, AdaBoost, and boosting were more effective than the individual ML technique (ANN). The boosting indicates the highest value of R2 equals 0.96, and AdaBoost gives 0.93, while the ANN model was less accurate, indicating the coefficient of determination value equals 0.87. The lesser values of the errors, MAE, MSE, and RMSE of the boosting technique give 1.69 MPa, 4.16 MPa, and 2.04 MPa, respectively, indicating the high accuracy of the boosting algorithm. However, the statistical check of the errors (MAE, MSE, RMSE) and k-fold cross-validation method confirms the high precision of the boosting technique. In addition, the sensitivity analysis was also introduced to evaluate the contribution level of the input parameters towards the prediction of CS of GPC. The better accuracy can be achieved by incorporating other ensemble ML techniques such as AdaBoost, bagging, and gradient boosting. © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
dc.language en
dc.subject Adaptive boosting
dc.subject Compressive strength
dc.subject Concretes
dc.subject Fly ash
dc.subject Geopolymers
dc.subject Inorganic polymers
dc.subject Neural networks
dc.subject Sensitivity analysis
dc.subject Slags
dc.subject Supervised learning
dc.subject Sustainable development
dc.subject Coefficient of determination
dc.subject Concrete compressive strength
dc.subject Environment
dc.subject Environmental threats
dc.subject Geopolymer concrete
dc.subject Machine learning algorithms
dc.subject Machine learning approaches
dc.subject Machine learning techniques
dc.subject Properties of concretes
dc.subject Supervised machine learning
dc.subject Forecasting
dc.title Prediction of geopolymer concrete compressive strength using novel machine learning algorithms
dc.type Article
dc.rights.holder Scopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitation Polymers. Vol 13, No.19 (2021)
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/polym13193389


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics