การศึกษาความคิดเห็นและความพึงพอใจต่อ มาตรการกระตุ้นเศรษฐกิจ “ชิมช้อปใช้”

Abstract

The purposes of this research were to study viewpoints and satisfactions of the population towards the country's economic stimulus policy, "Chim Shop Chai" Measure, involving parts of the measure's accessibilities, gaining benefits, and incurring problems. This study used the Quantitative Research Method. The instrument used to collect data was a questionnaire. The data was collected from accidental samples aged over 18 years and either lived or worked in Bangkok Metropolitan or surrounding area. The statistical techniques used are percentage, means, standard deviation (SD), t-test, and one way analysis of valiance (ANOVA). The majority samples consisted of females aged between 18-35 years. More than half of them had undergraduate education, occupation in private company or self-employed business, and had average income between 10,000-30,000 Baht per month. Almost half of them live in Bangkok or surrounding area. In part of political viewpoints found that almost half of the samples admired and went most for the opposition party. In part of accessibility for a right of "Chim Shop Chai" Measure founded that more than 62.1% received the right and participated this project. Analytical outcomes of the differential in each factor founded that the differences of sex, age, occupation, income, domicile, and admiration in political party affected their opinion towards different problems of the "Chim Shop Chai" Measure. In part of satisfaction founded that the differences of sex, age, occupation, income, domicile, and admiration in political party affected their satisfaction towards different satisfactory levels of the registration system to receive the right. Findings on the satisfaction towards using benefits from this project founded that the differences of age, occupation, domicile, and political party had different satisfaction significantly at the statistical level of 0.05. The findings of this research found that accessibility and entitlement to the right had still been the obstacles for the groups of older persons and persons who disabled access to electronic devices or smart phones in order to register their right with. This caused the deserved targets of the right disabled in receiving their right in reality and made this economic stimulus policy be misused with the aimed group of targets. Based on the major findings, I would recommend the government sector to support researching studies in impactful factors of economic stimulation with each population age range for the highest effectiveness of the government policy.