Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/29313
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGrant A.
dc.contributor.authorTan C.J.
dc.contributor.authorWattanasirichaigoon S.
dc.contributor.authorRungruanghiranya S.
dc.contributor.authorThongphiew A.
dc.contributor.authorThavorn K.
dc.contributor.authorChaiyakunapruk N.
dc.contributor.otherSrinakharinwirot University
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-15T02:08:16Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-15T02:08:16Z-
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85159406984&doi=10.18332%2ftid%2f161024&partnerID=40&md5=2c0dacd19927814a7e6764c12304ea43
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/29313-
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION The SMART Quit Clinic Program (FAHSAI Clinic) has been implemented in Thailand since 2010; however, it remains unclear whether the benefits gained from this program justify its costs. We assessed its cost-effectiveness compared to usual care in a population of Thai smokers with cardiovascular disease (CVD) from a societal perspective. METHODS We conducted a cost-utility analysis using a Markov model to simulate lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of Thai smokers aged ≥35 years receiving smoking cessation services offered from FAHSAI Clinic or usual care over a horizon of 50 years. The model used a 6-month continuous abstinence rate from a multicenter prospective study of 24 FAHSAI Clinics. A series of sensitivity analyses including probabilistic sensitivity analysis were conducted to assess robustness of study findings. Cost data are presented in US$ for 2020. RESULTS The FAHSAI Clinic was dominant as it was less costly ($9537.92 vs $10964.19) and more effective (6.06 vs 5.96 QALYs) compared with usual care over the 50-year time horizon. Changes in risks of stroke and coronary heart disease among males had the largest impact on the cost-effectiveness findings. The probability that FAHSAI Clinic was cost-effective was 99.8% at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $5120. CONCLUSIONS The FAHSAI Clinic smoking cessation program was clinically superior and cost-saving compared to usual care for Thai patients with CVD in all scenarios. A budget impact analysis is needed to estimate the financial impact of adopting this program within the Thai healthcare system. © 2023 Grant A. et al.
dc.publisherEuropean Publishing
dc.subjectcardiovascular disease
dc.subjectcost-effectiveness analysis
dc.subjectsmoking cessation
dc.subjectThailand
dc.titleCost-effectiveness analysis of the SMART quit clinic program in smokers with cardiovascular disease in Thailand
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitationTobacco Induced Diseases. Vol 21, No.April (2023), p.1-9
dc.identifier.doi10.18332/tid/161024
Appears in Collections:Scopus 2023

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.