Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/29189
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPhongkhun K.
dc.contributor.authorPothikamjorn T.
dc.contributor.authorSrisurapanont K.
dc.contributor.authorManothummetha K.
dc.contributor.authorSanguankeo A.
dc.contributor.authorThongkam A.
dc.contributor.authorChuleerarux N.
dc.contributor.authorLeksuwankun S.
dc.contributor.authorMeejun T.
dc.contributor.authorThanakitcharu J.
dc.contributor.authorWalker M.
dc.contributor.authorGopinath S.
dc.contributor.authorTorvorapanit P.
dc.contributor.authorLangsiri N.
dc.contributor.authorWorasilchai N.
dc.contributor.authorMoonla C.
dc.contributor.authorPlongla R.
dc.contributor.authorKates O.S.
dc.contributor.authorNematollahi S.
dc.contributor.authorPermpalung N.
dc.contributor.otherSrinakharinwirot University
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-15T02:08:07Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-15T02:08:07Z-
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85160206801&doi=10.1093%2fcid%2fciad064&partnerID=40&md5=add5917cb3bfe1d6ca4fd2847728c29f
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/29189-
dc.description.abstractBackground. Infectious diseases and ophthalmology professional societies have disagreed regarding ocular screening in patients with candidemia. We aimed to summarize the current evidence on the prevalence of ocular candidiasis (OC) and Candida endophthalmitis (CE) according to the standardized definitions. Methods. A literature search was conducted from the inception date through 16 October 2022 using PubMed, Embase, and SCOPUS. Pooled prevalence of ocular complications was derived from generalized linear mixed models (PROSPERO CRD42022326610). Results. A total of 70 and 35 studies were included in the meta-analysis for OC and concordant CE (chorioretinitis with vitreous involvement), respectively. This study represented 8599 patients with candidemia who underwent ophthalmologic examination. Pooled prevalences (95% CI) of OC, overall CE, concordant CE, and discordant CE were 10.7% (8.4–13.5%), 3.1% (2.1–4.5%), 1.8% (1.3–2.6%), and 7.4% (4.5–12%) of patients screened, respectively. Studies from Asian countries had significantly higher concordant CE prevalence (95% CI) of patients screened (3.6%; 2.9–4.6%) compared with studies from European countries (1.4%; .4–5%) and American countries (1.4%; .9–2.2%) (P <.01). Presence of total parenteral nutrition and Candida albicans was associated with CE, with pooled odds ratios (95% CI) of 6.92 (3.58–13.36) and 3.02 (1.67–5.46), respectively. Conclusions. Prevalence of concordant CE overall and among Asian countries was 2 and 4 times higher than the prevalence previously reported by the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) of <0.9%, respectively. There is an urgent need to study optimal screening protocols and to establish joint recommendations by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and AAO. © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved.
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.subjectcandidemia
dc.subjectendophthalmitis
dc.subjectocular candidiasis
dc.titlePrevalence of Ocular Candidiasis and Candida Endophthalmitis in Patients with Candidemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitationClinical Infectious Diseases. Vol 76, No.10 (2023), p.1738-1749
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/cid/ciad064
Appears in Collections:Scopus 2023

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.