Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/27549
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWatanapanyasakul R.
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-14T03:17:37Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-14T03:17:37Z-
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn1252208
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85123314413&doi=10.35755%2fjmedassocthai.2022.S01.00026&partnerID=40&md5=193f6b8b3594c22cee7c36183333c0a1
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/27549-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To assess content validity, construct validity, and reliability of Relational Ethics Scale (RES) in Thai version. Materials and Methods: The researcher translated RES into Thai and then translated back into English. Then, RES in Thai version was given to 120 patients aged between 18 to 60 years in Department of Psychiatry, HRH Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Medical Center. Content validity was measured by item-objective congruence index (IOC). Construct validity was measured by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), referred from the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) and loading factor. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was used for reliability measurement. Results: IOC of RES in Thai version was 0.86, RMSEA was 0.06, the loading factor of all questions >0.30, and overall internal consistency of RES was 0.96. Conclusion: RES in Thai version contained content validity and construct validity. If it is developed further to determine predictive, concurrent validity and determine sensitivity and specificity, it can be used for evaluation and treatment planning accurately in psychological intervention. © JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF THAILAND
dc.languageen
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectarticle
dc.subjectconcurrent validity
dc.subjectconfirmatory factor analysis
dc.subjectconstruct validity
dc.subjectcontent validity
dc.subjectCronbach alpha coefficient
dc.subjectethics
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectinternal consistency
dc.titleThe Study of Content Validity, Construct Validity, Reliability of the Relational Ethics Scale (RES) in the Thai Version
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitationJournal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol 105, No. (2022), p.S73-S79
dc.identifier.doi10.35755/jmedassocthai.2022.S01.00026
Appears in Collections:Scopus 2022

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.