Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/27199
Title: GlauNet: Glaucoma Diagnosis for OCTA Imaging Using a New CNN Architecture
Authors: Manassakorn A.
Auethavekiat S.
Sa-Ing V.
Chansangpetch S.
Ratanawongphaibul K.
Uramphorn N.
Tantisevi V.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence
convolutional neural network
deep learning
glaucoma
optical coherence tomography angiography
retinal blood vessels
Issue Date: 2022
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Abstract: Glaucoma is a neurodegenerative disease that affects the optic nerve head and causes visual field defect. Current investigations focus on neural component which may overlook other important factors such as the vascular cause. The optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) imaging has been developed and provided quantitative parameters that showed good diagnostic accuracy to detect glaucoma. However, those parameters are based on image processing of observed clinical findings, therefore, some image information can be lost. Convolutional neural network has been successfully applied for automatic feature extraction and object classification. In this study, the glaucoma diagnosis network, namely GlauNet, has been proposed. GlauNet consists of two sections: the feature-extraction section and the classification section. The feature-extraction section has three convolutional layers. Each convolutional layer is followed by rectified linear unit and maximum pooling layer. The classification section contains five fully connected layers. GlauNet was trained with 258 glaucomatous and 439 non-glaucomatous eyes. The visualization of the feature-extraction section showed the highlight in the area of optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer in the superotemporal and inferotemporal regions. It was then tested on 27 glaucomatous and 48 non-glaucomatous eyes. Its sensitivity and specificity were 88.9% with 89.6%, respectively. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve of GlauNet was 0.89. GlauNet was robust against the artifacts. Its sensitivity and specificity were still higher than 80% (82.4% and 80.3%, respectively) when tested on 88 poor-quality images. © 2022 Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. All rights reserved.
URI: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85137866881&doi=10.1109%2fACCESS.2022.3204029&partnerID=40&md5=8857f9a833dfad51ee1457dc6d60b38c
https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/27199
ISSN: 21693536
Appears in Collections:Scopus 2022

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.