Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/27171
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAssapattarapun V.
dc.contributor.authorTalungchit S.
dc.contributor.authorJirawechwongsakul P.
dc.contributor.authorTaebunpakul P.
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-14T03:16:57Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-14T03:16:57Z-
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn18742106
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85142356382&doi=10.2174%2f18742106-v16-e2210130&partnerID=40&md5=bda65e1859ee23b134c07c5fd5a48f3b
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/27171-
dc.description.abstractBackground and Objectives: Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a common T-cell-mediated inflammatory oral mucosal disease. One of the complaints among OLP patients is xerostomia. However, the relationship between oral dryness and a decreased salivary-flow rate in these patients is not yet conclusive. So, we investigated oral dryness and the salivary-flow rate in OLP patients using various measurements. Material and Methods: Thirty OLP patients and 30 controls were included. The oral-dryness symptoms were collected using the Xerostomia Inventory (XI) and Bother Index (BI). The salivary-flow rate was measured using a Modified Schirmer Test (MST) and the spitting method. The clinical signs of dry mouth were determined by the clinical oral-dryness score (CODS). The Thongprasom score was used to evaluate the severity of OLP. The data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Results: The XI score and BI score in the OLP group were significantly higher than in the control group. However, CODS, MST, the unstimulated salivary-flow rate, and the stimulated salivary-flow rate were not significantly different between the two groups. There was no correlation between oral dryness and the salivary-flow rate in OLP patients. The severity of OLP was also not correlated to oral dryness and the salivary-flow rate. Conclusion: OLP patients had more complaints about mouth dryness than the controls. However, the salivary-flow rates between the two groups were not different. Additionally, the severity of OLP was not related to dry mouth or the salivary-flow rate. The possible reasons for oral dryness among people with OLP require further investigation. © 2022 Assapattarapun et al.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherBentham Science Publishers
dc.subjectClinical oral dryness score
dc.subjectModified schirmer test
dc.subjectOral dryness
dc.subjectOral lichen planus
dc.subjectSalivary flow rate
dc.subjectXerostomia
dc.titleEvaluation of Oral Dryness and the Salivary-flow Rate in Patients with Oral Lichen Planus
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitationIEEE Transactions on Plasma Science. Vol 50, No.6 (2022), p.1430-1439
dc.identifier.doi10.2174/18742106-v16-e2210130
Appears in Collections:Scopus 2022

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.