Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/22175
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorNapa Sae-bae
dc.contributor.authorJirayu Pornsirianun
dc.contributor.authorPhuripakorn Sriyod
dc.contributor.authorChinatan Sukjam
dc.contributor.authorNapa Sae-bae
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-21T03:28:37Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-21T03:28:37Z-
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/22175-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to compare the performance of facial recognition systems in terms of recognition performance, the bias of gender on a face recognition system, and the effectiveness of facial recognition attacks using dictionary attack methods on the Asian population datasets. Typically, the face recognition system consists of three main components: the face detection module, the face embedding module, and the face matching module. The process starts by detecting the face region from the face image. Then, the face region image is converted to a vector (embedding) representation. Lastly, the distance between a test image and a template (an enrolled face image) is computed by calculating the vector similarity and the decision to accept or reject the test image depends on the computed similarity score. The biometrics system performance is then evaluated based on False Acceptance Rate and False Rejection Rate. The models used in this research were 3 pre-trained models: ResNet50, SeNet50, and FaceNet. The systems were evaluated based on an Asian face database comprising 1819 images of 107 individuals. The result indicated no bias in system performance when tested against a facial image with different gender attributes. The model with the best recognition performance was SeNet50. Lastly, using a dictionary attack, researchers examined the attack performance of facial recognition systems, it found that the attack has a high success rate of 22.94%, 21.5%, and 22.72% when 5 photos were used on ResNet50, SeNet50, and FaceNet models, respectively.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherDepartment of Computer Science, Srinakharinwirot University
dc.subjectDictionary attack
dc.subjectFace detection
dc.subjectFace embedding
dc.subjectFace encryption
dc.titlePerformance evaluation of face encoding techniques: a case study on the Asian population
dc.typeWorking Paper
Appears in Collections:ComSci-Senior Projects

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.