Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/21593
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Waleerat Sansee | |
dc.contributor.author | Chaowit Suttiwanit | |
dc.contributor.author | Varavee Temprom | |
dc.contributor.author | Chamaiporn Sangnon | |
dc.contributor.author | Wanvisa Panichaporn | |
dc.contributor.author | Nitaya Viriyatharakij | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-05-30T14:48:53Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-05-30T14:48:53Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/21593 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tmj/article/view/246467 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: 1) To analyse the effect of body mass index (BMI) on acromial distance (AD) evaluation in sitting and supine positions. 2) To clarify intra- and inter-rater reliability of AD evaluation. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted by 4 well trained assessors in 2 Physical Therapy Faculties. A total of 114 healthy participants (aged 18–48 years old), comprising 20 males and 94 females. Participants were recruited through purposive sampling and separated into two groups according to BMI group 1 (BMI less than 23 kg/m2; n=69), and BMI group 2 (BMI greater than or equal to 23 kg/m2; n=44). Main outcome measures were the AD evaluations in both sitting and supine positions were evaluated, and compared between BMI groups using independent-sample T Test. Results: For participants in BMI group 1 and group 2, the average AD in the sitting position was 69.1 mm and 81.3 mm (P < 0.001), respectively. In the supine position, the average AD for participants in BMI group 1 and group 2 was 39.4 mm and 56.1 mm (P < 0.001), respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in AD values between the BMI groups (P < 0.001). The AD evaluations showed excellent both intra-rater reliability (ICC3,1 0.991 to 0.999) and inter-rater reliability (ICC2,1 0.954 to 0.999). Conclusions: The AD values in both positions were significantly increased in the participants with a higher BMI. Therefore, BMI should be taken into account when using AD for clinical monitoring and interventions to correct pectoralis minor length or rounded shoulder posture. | |
dc.language | en | |
dc.subject | Acromial distance | |
dc.subject | Pectoralis minor length | |
dc.subject | Body mass index | |
dc.subject | Rounded shoulder posture | |
dc.title | Influence of Body Mass Index on Acromial Distance Evaluated in Sitting and Supine Positions: A cross-sectional study | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitation | Thammasat Medical Journal , Vol 20 No. 3 (2020): JULY - SEPTEMBER | |
Appears in Collections: | Pt-Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.